Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models with Asymmetric Multivariate Laplace Innovations

About This Presentation
Title:

Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models with Asymmetric Multivariate Laplace Innovations

Description:

Normality-MLE/QMLE = feasible consistent but inefficient DCC coefficients ... Much higher kurtosis when. the AML distribution is used. ... –

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: RG81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models with Asymmetric Multivariate Laplace Innovations


1
Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models with
Asymmetric Multivariate Laplace Innovations
  • Juan P. Cajigas
  • Centre for Econometric Analysis (CEA_at_Cass)
  • Cass Business School, London

2
Dynamic Conditional Correlation (S,L)Engle
(2002), Engle and Sheppard (2001)
3
Implications of the assumption of normality
  • Normality-MLE/QMLE feasible consistent but
    inefficient DCC coefficients (Bollerslev and
    Wooldridge, 1992)
  • Normality is not a satisfactory property for
    financial time series.
  • Non normal distribution to achieve efficiency
    with implication for the first stage
  • Importance of efficiency for
  • Portfolio allocation
  • VaR Analysis (Risk)

4
The main contribution of this paper(AML)-ADDCC
(1,1)
  • We propose an AGDCC (1,1) model and its nested
    versions using the Asymmetric Multivariate
    Laplace (AML) distribution for the vector of
    standardized residuals.
  • This is a special case of the Geometric Stable
    law (Kotz, Kozubowski and Podgorski, 2003)
  • It preserves convolution properties
  • It has finite variance,
  • It has a closed-form,
  • It allows for leptokurtosis and asymmetries.

5
The AML distribution (...continue)
  • Geometric Stable Distributions

6
The AML distribution (...continue) NO
  • If we have that,
  • then

7
The AML distribution (...continue)
  • Main properties
  • Tail behavior governed by the index of stability.
    For the AML distribution
  • Density function
  • where v (2 - n)/2 and Kv(u) is the modified
    Bessel function of the third kind

8
The AML distribution
  • Mixtures of normal distributions representation
  • where YN(0,H), Zexp(1) and XAML(m,H).
    Therefore,

9
AML distribution
10
Two-Step estimation feasible (1)
  • Normal case (Engle, 2002 Engle and Sheppard,
    2001)

11
Two-Step estimation feasible (2)
  • Normal case
  • Engle (2002) uses Newey-McFadden (1994, HoE)
    results on GMM to justify the use of MLE for
    consistency

12
AML Two-Step estimation feasible
  • FIRST STEP Conditional variances

13
AML Two-Step estimation feasible
  • SECOND STEP Conditional correlations

14
AML Two-Step estimation feasible
  • For n 2s 3, s 0,1, the Bessel function has
    a closed form that transforms the density
    function to

15
AML Two-Step estimation feasible
  • In this case we have

16
Empirical applications (1)Modelling using DCC
models
  • Data as in Cappiello, Engle and Sheppard (2004)
  • a) FTSE All-World weekly indices converted to US
    denominated returns for 21 countries and
  • b) Bond indices of 12 constructed by Datastream.
  • Sample Period 08/01/1987 - 07/02/2001

17
Main findings from the empirical application
using stocks/bonds
  • Significant differences with Cappiello et al
    (2004) in the asymmetric models (AGDCC and ADCC)
  • Asymmetric terms much smaller when the AML
    distribution is used instead of the normal
  • Log-likelihood does not increase with the
    inclusion of asymmetries when the AML
    distribution is used

18
Main findings from the empirical application
  • Distribution of conditional correlations
  • Much higher kurtosis when the AML distribution
    is used.
  • The impact of this feature could be relevant
    for VaR applications
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com