COMM 472: Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

COMM 472: Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions

Description:

These moments are called the skewness and kurtosis. ... normal distribution (mean 0, variance 1) the skewness is 0 and the kurtosis is 3. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: murrayc3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COMM 472: Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions


1
COMM 472 Quantitative Analysis of Financial
Decisions
  • Part 1
  • Fundamental Properties of Returns

2
Equity Returns
  • Throughout this section, we will make extensive
    use of the dynamic properties of equity returns
  • Returns are dynamic in the following sense what
    happens to returns today may, and in fact does,
    effect how returns behave tomorrow.

3
Preliminary Concepts and Notation
  • Well focus our attention on equity returns.
  • Random returns are the result of one or both of
    the following effects
  • Future dividends (usually random),
  • Future prices (usually random).

4
Preliminary Concepts and Notation
  • Note that returns are the sum of two components
  • The Dividend Yield
  • The Capital Gain

5
Preliminary Concepts and Notation
  • Note
  • This definition is of a gross return (i.e. net
    return gross return - 1).
  • The return relates to a price change over some
    specific period of time. That time period can be
    an instant, a day, a month, a year, etc.
    depending on the application. (Well spend a lot
    of time in this course talking about the effect
    of time horizon on returns.)

6
Preliminary Concepts and Notation
  • Returns can also be stated in their logarithmic
    form
  • So that

7
Multiperiod Returns
  • Returns over long horizons show the effect of
    compounding
  • For simple returns (no dividends)
  • Long-horizon returns are the product of
    short-horizon returns.

8
Multiperiod Returns
  • For log returns (no dividends), long-horizon
    returns are the sum of short-horizon returns,
    since

9
Multiperiod Returns
  • When we choose whether to work with simple or log
    returns we make a tradeoff
  • Simple returns are more convenient when
    aggregating returns of stocks in portfolios. (The
    weighted average of simple returns is the simple
    return on the portfolio. This is not true for log
    returns.)
  • Log returns are more convenient when aggregating
    returns of a stock or index across time (For
    statistics, it is more convenient to work with
    sums than products. For example, the sum of
    normally distributed log returns is normal
    whereas the product is not.)

10
The Distribution of Returns
  • Returns are usually random. We can add some
    structure to the return process if we specify a
    distribution for the returns.
  • One common specification is that single period
    log returns are normally distributed.
  • Is this a reasonable assumption?

11
Estimating Moments of Returns
  • Random variables can be characterized by their
    moments.
  • Typically, we work with the first two moments
    the mean and the variance.

12
Other Moments
  • Higher moments are sometimes of interest
  • These moments are called the skewness and
    kurtosis. For a standard normal distribution
    (mean 0, variance 1) the skewness is 0 and the
    kurtosis is 3.

13
Dynamic Portfolio Strategies
  • Part 2
  • Dynamic Properties of Returns

14
Statistical Properties of Long Horizon Returns
  • The properties of long-horizon returns can be
    derived from their short-run properties.
  • We make use of the following properties of
    expectations and variances

15
Case 1 IID Normal Returns
  • If 1-period log returns are independent and
    identically normally distributed then the mean
    and variance of the returns distribution grows
    proportionally with the horizon.
  • Remember that

16
Long-Run Mean Returns
  • So
  • Notice that
  • No one return provides information about any
    other (returns are independent).
  • Each return has the same mean (identically
    distributed).

17
Long-Run Variance
  • Notice that
  • Returns are uncorrelated so that no covariance
    terms show up (independent).
  • All variances are the same (identically
    distributed).

18
IID Return Dynamics
  • This model of return dynamics, although very
    simple, has been the mainstay of Dynamic Asset
    Pricing for many years.
  • Black-Scholes pricing is based on this model of
    returns.
  • Question Does the data support this hypothesis?

19
Empirical Properties of Long-Horizon Returns
  • Are returns independent?
  • Independence has broader implications, but we
    will focus on whether or not returns are
    uncorrelated.
  • Two methods of testing
  • Directly measure autocorrelations of returns.
  • Examine variance ratios.

20
Empirical Properties of Long Horizon Returns
  • Why do we worry about independence of returns?
  • Dependencies, as we will see, have dramatic
    effects on long-run return properties.
  • One example time diversification
  • If returns from one time period are negatively
    correlated with those from another, then long
    horizon returns will be less risky than would be
    predicted if they were assumed independent.

21
Autocorrelation
  • Definition
  • The autocorrelation coefficient measures the
    correlation between two random variables from a
    time series (eg. two returns on an index).
  • The autocorrelation must be specified with
    respect to some lag length (the time between
    measurements of the random returns)

22
Autocorrelation
  • Well assume throughout that return series are
    covariance-stationary
  • One-period returns at all dates have the same
    variance.
  • The covariance between returns at different dates
    depends only on the lag (k)

23
Estimating Autocorrelations
  • Correlation coefficients can be calculated by
    using sample averages

24
Testing Significance
  • In order to assess the statistical significance
    of these autocorrelations we need to know the
    sampling distributions of the statistics.
  • If we assume returns are IID

25
Testing for IID Returns with Autocorrelations
  • One problem with testing for IID returns using
    autocorrelations is that it is not clear what
    lags to use to test for zero autocorrelation.
  • If returns are IID all autocorrelations should be
    zero.
  • One solution is to use a statistic that
    summarizes many autocorrelations.

26
Portmanteau Statistic
  • The Q-statistic simply sums the squares of many
    autocorrelation statistics
  • This statistic tests for zero autocorrelation at
    all of m lags, giving power to test against a
    broad variety of alternative hypotheses for
    return dynamics.

27
Testing for IID Returns with the Portmanteau
Statistic
  • The Q-statistic has a chi-squared distribution
    with m degrees of freedom.
  • This distribution can be used to determine,
    statistically, whether or not the statistic is
    significantly different from zero.

28
Variance Ratio Statistics
  • We saw earlier that if returns are IID, the
    variance of long-horizon returns is proportional
    to the horizon. This result serves as the basis
    for using Variance Ratios to test whether or
    not returns are IID.
  • Definition
  • The q-horizon variance ratio statistic is the
    ratio of the variance of the q-period return to
    the variance of the 1-period return, divided by q.

29
Variance Ratio Statistics
  • Note that for IID returns this statistic should
    be identically 1 for all horizons.

30
Variance Ratio Statistics
  • eg. With two-period IID returns

31
Variance Ratio Statistics
  • As an alternative, suppose returns are
    autocorrelated

32
Variance Ratio Statistics
  • This is an important result that has implications
    for portfolio choice
  • The investing horizon can have dramatic effects
    on the risk-return relationship.
  • In particular, if returns are negatively
    autocorrelated, long horizon investors will face
    less variable equity returns than will short
    horizon investors.

33
Testing for IID Returns with Variance Ratio
Statistics
  • The null hypothesis is that returns are IID
    normal
  • Well work with 2n1 log prices to determine the
    VR(2) statistic

34
Testing for IID Returns with Variance Ratio
Statistics
  • Note that
  • With log returns, the mean return is simply the
    geometric average return (the last log price
    minus the first log price divided by 2n).
  • The mean of the two period return is twice the
    one period return.
  • Only n two-period returns are used to estimate
    the two-period return variance.

35
Testing for IID Returns with Variance Ratio
Statistics
  • The variance ratio statistic is normally
    distributed

36
Testing for IID Returns with Variance Ratio
Statistics
  • The general case

37
Testing for IID Returns with Variance Ratio
Statistics
  • An improvement (correct bias and overlap)

38
Variance Ratio Statistics Distribution of Test
Statistics
  • The variance ratio statistics are normally
    distributed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com