GAUSSIAN NETWORK MODEL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

GAUSSIAN NETWORK MODEL

Description:

All fluctuations are assumed to be isotropic; no directional preferences. ... The major drawback in GNM is about isotropic fluctuations. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: sebn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GAUSSIAN NETWORK MODEL


1
GAUSSIAN NETWORK MODEL
  • Sebnem Essiz
  • Chem2440, Spring 2003

2
Outline
  • A brief Description of GNM
  • Basic approximations in the model
  • Theory behind the model, and the calculation of
    mean square fluctuations
  • Application of model to apomyoglobin
  • Summary

3
GNM
  • A coarse grained model to study vibrational
    dynamics of proteins in the folded state.
  • Interactions between residues are replaced by
    linear springs, in analogy with the elasticity
    theory of random polymer networks.
  • The above approximation is based on a Gaussian
    Distribution of inter-atomic distances about
    their equilibrium values.

4
Basic approximations in GNM
  • No distinction is made between different types of
    amino acids, so that a generic force constant g
    is adopted for the interaction potential between
    all pair of residues which are sufficiently
    close. a single parameter harmonic potential
  • All fluctuations are assumed to be isotropic no
    directional preferences. This makes the number of
    independent modes as N-1, instead of 3N-6 in 3-D
    description.

5
Schematic Representation of fluctuations
  • Ri0 and Rj0 are equilibrium positions, and their
    instantaneous values are Ri and Rj. sij0 and sij
    are the equilibrium and instantaneous separation
    vectors. sij - sij0 Rj- Ri

6
Overall Conformational Potential
  • Overall conformational potential of the structure
    is
  • Here DR is N-dimensional vector whose elements
    are the fluctuation vectors DRi of individual
    residues.g is the single parameter force
    constant.
  • The above potential can also be seen as a
    Hamiltonian whose integration will give
    configurational partition function ZN

7
Kirchhoff Matrix of contacts
  • rc is the cutoff separation defining the range of
    interaction of non-bonded a carbons. A reasonable
    cutoff distance is 7.0 Ao.
  • The ith diagonal element of G characterizes the
    coordination number of residue i.

8
Fluctuations
  • Fluctuations in a folded protein are assumed to
    obey Gaussian distribution
  • With analogy to Gaussian networks,
    con-figurational partition function will be

9
Fluctuations
  • We can find the cross-correlations between
    residue fluctuations
  • (3kBT/g)G-1
  • To find the mean square fluctuations of
    individual residues take ij

10
Results
  • The GNM results for mean square fluctuations is
    nearly full agreement with x-ray crystallographic
    results o. In the following graph you will find
    only the results for apomyoglobin.
  • (The mean square fluctuations of Ca of
    apomyoglobin, ltRi2gt as a function of residue
    index i. The dashed line is experimental results
    for temperature factor,Bi8p2ltDRi . DRi gt/3)
  • If you want to see more results about GNM,
    you can find 12 more protein results in Folding
    Design, 2173-181(1997)

11
Summary
  • On a coarse-grained scale molecular motions can
    be approximated by normal fluctuations with
    rescaled force constants, even if the motions of
    individual atoms depart from harmonicity.
  • It yields an analytical solution, devoid of
    sampling inaccuracies found in most other types
    of simulations. The computer time is limited by
    the inversion of the Kirchhoff matrix, and this
    time is several time shorter than MD or NMA
    calculations.
  • The major drawback in GNM is about isotropic
    fluctuations. In reality the fluctuations are in
    general anisotropic and the direction of these
    motions are directly relevant to biological
    function and mechanism.

12
REFERENCES
  • I.Bahar, A.R. Atilgan, and B. Erman, Folding
    Des.2,173(1997)
  • T. Haliloglu,I. Bahar, and B. Erman, Phys.Rev.
    Letters.79, 3090(1997)
  • I. Bahar and R.L. Jernigan, J.Mol.Bio.
    281,871(1998)
  • I. Bahar, B. Erman, R.L. Jernigan, A.R. Atilgan,
    and D. Covell, J. Mol.Bio. 285, 1023(1999)
  • A.R. Atilgan,S.R. Durell, R.L Jernigan, M.C.
    Demirel, O.Keskin, and I.Bahar, Biophys. J.
    80,505(2001)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com