Title: TCOM 513 Optical Communications Networks
1TCOM 513Optical Communications Networks
- Spring, 2006
- Thomas B. Fowler, Sc.D.
- Senior Principal Engineer
- Mitretek Systems
2Topics for TCOM 513
- Week 1 Wave Division Multiplexing
- Week 2 Opto-electronic networks
- Week 3 Fiber optic system design
- Week 4 MPLS and Quality of Service
- Week 5 Heavy tails, Optical control planes
- Week 6 The business of optical networking
economics and finance - Week 7 Future directions in optical networking
3Where we are
- So far, weve examined
- How optical networks operate
- How to put them together
- Important questions remains
- What kind of network should I build?
- Size/capacity
- Where should I concentrate?
- Core
- Metro area
- Local access
4Topics for tonight
- Parameters affecting optical networking
- Pricing of network-type commodities
- The networking industry after the Big Crash
- Convergence
- Opportunities
5Uses of optical technology
- Campus-short haul
- May need to trench fiber, build network yourself
- Connecting buildings across town
- Trenching fiber not generally practical
- May want to lease dark fiber or wavelength
- Going long distances
- Unless you want to become IXC, forget about
laying your own fiber - Use fiber/service already in ground
- Dark fiber
- Amplifiers, repeaters, etc. provisioned by
service provider - You have to do rest of engineering
- Wavelength service
- You have to modulate/demodulate
- SONET
- You just connect your equipment to a standard
interface box
6Parameters affecting optical networking
- Major players
- User/consumer
- Internet service provider (ISP)
- Telco/CLEC
- Interexchange carrier (IXC)
- Long haul pipe provider
- Supplier
- Builder/installer
7Players (continued)
- Other interested parties
- Regulators
- Legislators/policy makers
- Consumer groups
- Environmentalists
8Issues
- Supply side
- How to finance construction
- How to estimate return on investment (ROI)
- How to make a business case for investment
- How to ward off obsolescence
- Demand side
- How to price to stimulate demand
- How to handle network externalities
- Network externality price people are willing to
pay depends on how many other people are using
network - How to allocate costs to equipment
- How to price shared services
- What should be free?
9Issues (continued)
- Regulatory side
- What should be subsidized, and by whom?
- What rules should be in place?
- Who should be protected?
- How to ensure that time constants for regulatory
process are shorter than those for technology
being regulated
10Supply and demand Economics 101
Highest price for full Network utilization
Demand per vendor (diluted by competition)
100
Revenue
Utilization
High
Medium
Low
Price
Price
11Bandwidth growth (demand) models
Actual
Assumed
12Limitations to bandwidth growth
- Demand slows due to legal issues
- Generally centered around IPR
- Digital distribution means perfect copies
- Internet radio tax
- Users can only absorb change at a certain rate
- Change usually means upgrades
- Forklift upgrades a hard sell to individuals and
businesses - Many are comfortable with current paradigm
- Regulatory questions are often vexing
- Universal service
- Cross-subsidization
- Business case for massive rewiring of U.S.
difficult to make - Uncertainty in demand
- Payback period may be extended
13Brief history
- 1980s RD phase of optical networks
- Early 1990s Major deployments
- Late 1990s Dot-com, venture capital boom
- Massive build-out
- Business case? Who cares? Money spigot is on
full! - Set up a company, develop some product, sell out
to Cisco, Lucent, or Nortel, or have an IPO, then
retire rich! - 2000-2002 The big crash
- Build out causes oversupply
- Optimistic demand forecasts do not materialize
- Prices drop
- Huge debt load cannot be serviced
- Next stop Chapter 11
- 2003-2005 Slow recovery, legal and regulatory
battles
14Pricing of network services
- Overview of network services
- Guaranteed, elastic, traffic contracts, network
control - Guaranteed and effective bandwidths
- Definition of effective bandwidths
- Relevance for pricing
- Economic models for networks
- Basic
- Finite resource sharing models/congestion pricing
- Implementation mechanisms
- Pricing for elastic services
- Pricing for guaranteed services
15Some thoughts on network pricing
- There is no single view on charging for network
services - Disparate models, contradictory proposals
- There is no need to price (or charge for) network
services ! - No congestion in the future !
- To cheap to meter
- Charge only for content
- There is nothing new in network pricing
- Economists have said everything before
- Never mind that they havent agreed
- Need abstraction, model to work with
Network Abstraction
Economic Theory
Model
Source Costas Courcoubetis/U Crete
16Why charge for network services?
- Charging is not only for making profits
- Improving network performance
- Providing stability and robustness
- Creating revenue (to pay debt service)
- Charging should provide
- Important information for network control
- Information for buildout of network
- Pricing should have certain characteristics
- Simple but not simplistic
- Understandable
- Implementable
- Competitive
17Network services as sold to users
- Packet or cell transport
- Contract usually has two aspects
- Connection or flow performance to be provided by
network - Traffic profile to which user must conform
Network
Service Interface
18Network service types
- Guaranteed
- Network provides some form of performance
guarantees - Loss
- Delay
- Jitter
- User may request some amount of network resources
- May be subject to admission control
- Typical of ATM, FR networks with Committed
Information Rate (CIR) - Commonly needed for isochronous traffic (e.g.,
video)
19Network service types (continued)
- Elastic or best effort
- No specific performance guarantees
- Performance deteriorates during overload periods
- No specific bandwidth request-users can use all
available bandwidth - Intended for applications that can adapt sending
rate
20Guaranteed services
- Performance guarantees
- Quality of service (QoS) loss, delay, jitter,
BER - May be statistical (e.g., loss lt 10-7) or
deterministic (delay lt 25 ms) - Required mechanisms
- Connection admission control (CAC)
- Policing
- User-network traffic contract
- Provides connections QoS and traffic description
- Network promises to support specified QoS
provided that users traffic satisfies his
specified profile
21Elastic or best effort services
- No specific performance guarantees
- Provide some form of fair treatment to different
connections - Feedback mechanisms used to inform source of
congestion or other problems - Explicit (e.g., data rate)
- Implicit (e.g., packet loss)
- Mechanisms programmed into routers, switches to
share bandwidth, enforce fairness - Source behavior
- Increase (additive) when no congestion
- Decrease (multiplicative) when congestion present
- Example TCP flow control
22ATM Forum Service Categories
23Enhancement of IP Infrastructure to Support
Diverse Set of Applications
- Service providers and network managers operating
multiple networks to support range of
applications - This is not desirable from economic and
maintenance standpoint - IP infrastructure devices becoming cheaper due to
proliferation of the public Internet and private
networks - Routers/switches and transmission
- Current IP infrastructure needs enhancement to
support voice, video, and data at acceptable
levels - Flow of real-time bit streams
This is the challenge for the decade
24VoIP Versus Conventional Telephony
Conventional Telephony Dedicated End-to-End
Connection
Tandem Switch
Central Office
Central Office
IP PBX
IP Wide Area Network (WAN_ (e.g., Internet
ISP
LAN
VoIP No End-to-End Dedicated Connection
Packets Take Best Available Path Through Network
25Benefits Claimed for VoIP Networks
- Cost savings
- Simplified, more rapid provisioning
- Easier management
- Less maintenance
- More rapid deployment of new services
- Unified messaging
26Risks Associated with VoIP
- Regulatory uncertainty
- Immature protocols and standards
- Data, telecommunications clash of cultures
- Unproven reliability and availability
- Security issues with IP networks
- Potential need for major network upgrades
- Enhanced 911 problems
- Network ubiquity problems
- Immature billing
27Generic VoIP Architecture (Local and Long
Distance)
IP PBX
IP PBX
IP PBX
IP PBX
Medium-Large Site with IP PBX
28Real-Time / Multimedia Requirements
- Support for a range of diverse applications
- Support for a range of bandwidth
- E.g., 128 Kbps collaborative video
conferencing to 45 Mbps video-on-
demand - Support for a range of performance for voice,
video, multimedia, critical data - Delay, delay variation, packet loss
- Support a range of communication models
- Point-to-point, multipoint, multicast, broadcast
- Use of QoS for cybersecurity looks promising
29Solution Alternatives
- Massive overbuild
- Brute force approach
- Feasible in good old POTS days
- Due to fractal nature of Internet traffic,
difficult to know how much capacity is enough - Fractal self-similar on multiple time scales
- Quality of Service (QoS) / Class of Service (CoS)
- Preferentially routes packets based on type of
traffic they carry - Does require software and / or hardware upgrades
- Complex nature of Internet and other networks
makes prediction of performance difficult
30Time scales of network control
31Network control and pricing
- Set of feasible service offerings depends on
network control mechanisms and provisioning
capabilities - Economic incentives influence both of these
- Network control
- Controls cell or packet flows to guarantee
contracts - Pricing
- Controls demand in order to improve efficiency
demand
32Network control and pricing (continued)
- Prices differentiate quality of service, not
content - Prices depend on demand
- Driven toward cost by competition
- But set on margin
- Prices proportional to
- Effective bandwidth for guaranteed services
- Throughput for best effort services
33Economic models for networks
- Context
- Communications services are economic commodities
- Exist within law of supply and demand
- Supply
- Amount produced or available
- Determined by technology of network elements,
including management and control, cost - Demand
- Amount users want
- Trade-off between QoS and willingness to pay
- Affected by competition, business climate
- Market interaction between service providers and
users comes through price
34Economic models (continued)
- Terminology
- Price associated with unit of service
- Tariff price structure as function of demand
- Common general form a bx, where x is demand
- Instrument for pursuing policy objectives
- Charge amount to be paid
- For more details, see
- http//www.aueb.gr/users/courcou/presentations/it
c99/sld001.htm
35Economics in telecommunications
- Large amount of work done on design of public
utility tariffs for telephony - 1970s peak load pricing, cross-subsidization
(local by long distance) - 1980s, 90s cost-based (subsidy-free) pricing,
nonlinear pricing, peak load pricing under
uncertainty, others - Does not directly translate into good models for
data - Sharing of equipment/facilities
- Burstiness of traffic
- Complicated by diversity of new user-network
contracts, multiplexing capabilities, resource
sharing models
36 Sharing finite resources
- Network resource management occurs in various
time scales - Short time scales
- Amount of resources is fixed
- Control deals with optimal sharing
- Long time scales
- Resources expanded in order to improve average
performance - Marginal cost pricing combines above time scales,
so operates in time frame of output expansion - Short time scale problem
- Prices used to control way resources shared
- Can be used as input for deciding capacity
expansion
37Congestion pricing
- Types of congestion
- Demand exceeds capacity (I)
- Overall performance depends on usage patterns
(II) - Technology suggests that (II) is of limited
interest - Under heavy multiplexing, solution of (II) -gt
solution of (I) - (I) is relatively simple (add more capacity or
raise prices) - (II) requires performance model of network
usage
38Congestion pricing summary
- Congestion price p controls sharing of C
- Determination of p based on network measurements
- Users i and j solve local optimization problems
- Need only prices posted by network
- Adjust x (network utilization)
39Expanding capacity
- Benefit B of operating network link of capacity C
under congestion price p - r cost (fixed or variable)
- To maximize B, solve dB/dC 0
- If p gt rvar then buy more capacity until p rvar
-
40Pricing at different time scales
- Congestion occurs at different times of day
- Implies hierarchy of decisions for users
- Higher level how much to transmit during day,
night - Lower level How fast, priority, when
41Pricing at different time scales (continued)
- Lower level decision depends on more detailed
information - Time-of-day pricing typically takes into account
average congestion during that period, qnetwork
utilization
42Implementation approaches
43Charging for best effort services
- Elastic demand
- Flexible contract with network
- No guarantees on delay, throughput
- Examples TCP/IP, ATM ABR, UBR
- Sources of randomness
- Number of users
- Amount of data
- Amount of available resources
44Charging for best effort services (continued)
- Need for flow control to regulate traffic
- Notions of fairness tend not to be economically
efficient - Goal provide optimal economic sharing of
resources - Two time scales
- Fast flow control maintains orderly flows
- Slow adjustment of prices regulates demand
- Common approach congestion pricing
- To reduce excess pricing
- To account for delay costs
- Prices can be computed two ways
- Dynamically based on demand
- Approximated from historical (time-of-day) demand
45Charging for best effort services (continued)
- Issues
- Cost of computing prices
- Cost of exchanging information with users
- Stability of pricing mechanism
- User preference
46The telecom world today after the Big Crash
- Overview of the current situation
- Evolution vs. revolution
- The growth paradigm
- The culture clash
- The winning strategy
- Fear vs. Greed
- Future architecture
47Current landscape
Content providers
Specialized (horizontal) Service providers
Vertically Integrated providers
Access Internet Long-haul Application
Optical equipment manufacturers
Optical fiber manufacturers
Legacy equipment manufacturers
48Major players
- Optical equipment manufacturers
- Nortel
- Lucent
- Alcatel
- Ciena
- Cisco
- Juniper
- Sycamore
- JDS Uniphase
- Optical fiber manufacturers
- Corning
- Pirelli
- Alcatel
49Major players (continued)
- Optical network providers
- Major IXCs (ATT, Worldcom, Sprint)
- Level3
- Global Crossing
- Content providers
- AOL
- Internet Portals (e.g., Yahoo, Google)
50How to think about the networking problem
Source J. McQuillan/NGN2000
51How to think about the networking problem
(continued)
- Evolution
- Future looks like the present, only more of it
- Same players, evolving technology, increasing
demand - Revolution
- Next Generation (NG) providers will build NG
networks using NG technology from NG vendors
using NG funds from (??) - New applications, new ways of doing things, new
paradigms will chase out the old - Organic growth
- Old and new will coexist in more complex, larger
whole
52Paradigm shift crash of the 1990s model
Source J. McQuillan/NGN2000
53Old paradigm
- Grow through acquisitions
- Use increasing value of your stock to finance
purchase of startups or competitors - Create positive feedback loop
- Commonly used by major players
- Cisco
- Lucent
- Nortel
54Old paradigm (continued)
Source J. McQuillan/NGN99
55Old paradigm (continued)
Source J. McQuillan/NGN2000
56How the world changes
Source J. McQuillan/NGN2000
57New paradigm
- Not yet emerged
- Likely to focus more on value than utility
- Wild predictions wont justify investment
- Jupiter By 2005, 75 of retail sales will be
online - Too many people burned in dot com flameout
58The culture clash
Source J. McQuillan/NGN2000
59Culture clash (continued)
- Bell heads
- Name sometimes given to RBOC workers
- Refers to anyone who thinks in terms of
enterprise networking - High reliability and availability
- Relatively slow pace of change
- Priority on customer service
- Often thought of as voice oriented
- Net heads
- Name given to IT folks who value network
connections - Different set of values
- Innovation outweighs inconveniences of crashes
- Customer service a low priority
- Often thought of as data oriented
60Culture clash (continued)
- Bell heads We know how to build and operate
massive mission critical networks, so we will
control the Next Generation networks - Net heads We are the only ones who get it, so
we will control them
61Who will be the winner?
RBOCs
CLECs, GXCs
Source J. McQuillan/NGN2000
62What will be the winning strategy?
- Vertical integration
- Traditional telephone/telecommunications model
- Own all facilities and data centers
- Offer customers one-stop shopping
- Horizontal specialization
- Offer best in class services
- Lease facilities/services from others
- Do one thing well
- Take advantage of standard interfaces
63Clash between fear and greed
- Fear profits are most important
- People invest money expecting that income will
exceed expenditures for any company - Value investing
- Greed only growth matters
- Grab market share and increase volume
- Dont worry about anything else
- Utility investing make a useful product,
everything else will take care of itself
64Fear vs. Greed
Greed Era
Fear Era
P/E
SP 500 Index / 10 year moving average of profits
Source Robert Schiller/Yale J. McQuillan/NGN2000
65Future architecture
- Innovation
- Multi-service switches will allow support of all
traffic - Legacy
- Internet as a service
- Services will otherwise remain separate
- Very efficient at what they do
- Convergence
- Internet (or private IP network) will be bearer
of all services - Voice
- Data
- Video
66Convergence Topics
- Definition of convergence
- Types of convergence
- History of convergence efforts
- Drivers (benefits)
- Impediments
- Rollout
67What is convergence?
- Convergence is a buzz word often used
- Brandished as wave of future
- Meaning far from clear
- Questions of interest
- To what extent is convergence real and wave of
future - To what extent is convergence just hype
- Basic idea use of some common infrastructure to
support multiple services
68Levels of convergence
Telecom/IT (e.g., ASPs, network computing)
Content Business
reflects
Application (e.g. music, video over Internet)
Increasing visibility to usercloser to edge
Switching (e.g., VoIP)
Transport (e.g., multiplexed channels)
69Why convergence?
- Most significant is a vision of the future a
more elegant world where everything is simpler - Most telecom services are a result technological
limitations existing at the time of their
introduction - Bandwidth of early telephone gear (200-3000 Hz)
- DSn bandwidth is multiple of 64K used for voice
- NTSC color TV state-of-art in 1940s
- In theory, convergence promises a clean slate
approach - Everything (or at least many things) reengineered
to provide better, more flexible service to the
user - In practice, a mixed bag, with some successes,
many disappointments, areas still under
development
70The present situation
- Current telecom infrastructure worldwide is
circuit oriented - SONET, ATM
- Works well
- Cost effective
- Will not change overnight
- Content-provider media in similar situation
- Radio, TV
- Vast installed base of equipment
- Service providers are not going to discard what
they own and know how to operate J. McQuillan - And what is making them money
71The present situation (continued)
- But the Internet continues to grow, and needs a
new infrastructure - Which may be able to support or deliver content
now delivered separately - Most of todays public network revenues and
profits do not come from the Internet
72Convergence at transport layer
73Convergence at switching layer
74Convergence at application (content) layer
75Example of convergence at application layer
Sources Beville, 1988 Time, 20 October 1997
76Convergence at IT/Telecom layer
77History of convergence efforts
- 1960s conversion of telephone system to digital
technology time-division multiplexing - 1975 SBS The One
- 1982 Integrated voice/data PBX
- 1988 ISDN
- 1991 BISDN
- 1998 Sprints ION
- 2003 VoIP, IP PBX
78History of efforts to implement convergence
- Transport
- 1960s Conversion of telephone system to digital
technology time-division multiplexing - 1980s SONET
- 2000s
- All optical networks (?)
- Status Successful
- Switching
- 1975 SBS The One
- 1982 Integrated voice/data PBX
- 1988 ISDN
- 1991 BISDN
- 1998 Sprints ION
- 2003 VoIP, IP PBX (?)
- Status Has not lived up to promises
Application 1990s Delivery of audio,
graphics, text via Internet 2000s Home
entertainment/video (?) Status Evolving full
impact not yet clear
IT/Telecom 1990s Network (grid) computing,
e.g. SETI_at_Home ASPs 2000s Commercial grid
computing (?) Status ASPs successful other
areas not yet clear
79Drivers for convergence
80Drivers behind convergence (benefits)
- Economies of scale in service delivery
- Simplified management
- Variety of end user interface equipment minimized
- Simplified provisioning (cabling, etc.) at user
site - Ability to define and deliver new service types
much greater and faster
81Impediments to convergence
- Business/organization changes required may be
great - Human factors time required for people to adjust
to new ways of doing things - Can be measured in generations
- Deployment time (time to depreciate and replace
existing equipment and infrastructure) - Regulatory and legal issues
82Impediments to convergence
83Forces acting on convergence
84Major changes likely to result from convergence
- Improved, faster access
- Specific defined services such as T1, Switched
Voice, FR, likely to fade as service definition
moves to edge of network - New services quickly designed and rolled out
- Business models in many industries will have to
be changed - Current content delivery paradigms
- Infrastructure to support content delivery
- More outsourcing as network increasingly viewed
as resource
85Broadband penetration in home market
86Expected rollout sequence for convergence
87Non-technological factors expected to slow
deployment of converged solutions
- Regulatory and legal issues the existing
telephone system is part of a web of subsidies
and social programs which cannot be turned off
overnight - Human factors people have to change their habits
and way of thinkingsomething which can require
generations - Economics of replacing existing infrastructure
nothing will be replaced just for the sake of
technological elegance there has to be a
business case - Proof of long-term reliability and robustness
hard-headed CIOs and CEOs will demand to see the
backup data, case studies, and histories - Demonstrated cost effectiveness When all the
costs are added up, will it still be cheaper to
go with a single infrastructure
88Non-technological factors expected to slow
deployment of converged solutions (continued)
- Development of new billing and support systems
Anyone in the business knows that this is an
extremely formidable problem. Existing systems
work well, but developing new ones that work as
well will be very expensive and time-consuming - Need to interoperate with existing (legacy)
infrastructure New technology has to be able to
integrate and interoperate with existing
infrastructure, both within and without a
companys boundaries.
89Recommended steps
- Create a strategic vision for the future of the
networks and services that will help
organizations achieve their business objectives.
- Develop a business case to rationalize the
investment and returns - Include soft benefits
- Do not overlook hidden costs and risks
- Identify the correct stage in the technology life
cycle when the benefits of implementing
convergence are maximized and the risks are
minimized - Not likely to be in early stages
- Develop a gradual migration strategy to integrate
existing legacy and converged infrastructures - Back-up strategy should be in place to mitigate
risks that go with an evolving technology
90Recommended steps (continued)
- Carefully examine the experiences of other
similar organizations which have implemented the
technology - Determine how successful the technology is
- Whether it has met performance and business
expectations. - Determine external factors which may impact
project success - Human factors
- Cultural clashes
- Regulatory issues
- Legal matters
- Evolving standards
- Stability of companies manufacturing products
- Availability of second sources
91Lessons learned from past
- Festina lente (Augustus)
- Technology tends to be hyped
- Non-technological factors govern if and when
acceptance will happen - Drop-in replacements easier and faster than those
requiring societal reorganization
92Where the opportunities are for optical networking
- Access (last mile)
- Necessary if really broad broadband ever to
reach homes (10 Mbps or greater) - Metro
- High speed network connectivity to businesses
- Debate between SONET and Gigabit/10 Gigabit
Ethernet - Long-haul
- Buy fibers, equipment, and networks for pennies
on the dollar - Global Crossing
- Enterprise
93Optical access alternatives
Source R. Lin/Terawave Networks/NGN2000
94Passive Optical Networking
Source R. Lin/Terawave Networks/NGN2000
95Verizon FIOS
96Verizon FIOS (continued)
- Pricing for FiOS
- 5 Mbps/2 Mbps for 34.95 a month as part
of a calling package, or 39.95 a month
stand-alone - 15 Mbps/2 Mbps for 44.95 a month as part
of a calling package, or 49.95 a month
stand-alone - 30 Mbps/5 Mbps at 199.95
- All FiOS Internet Service packages include
- Free installation by Verizon professionals
- Ultra high-speed Internet access
- Free networking router
- MSN Premium Internet Software a 99
annual value - 24/7 live technical support
- Up to nine verizon.net e-mail accounts
- Access to newsgroups
- Personal Web space of 10 MB
- TV also available
97Home access speed trends
98Long haul
- Country (and world) already well covered with
long-haul networks - Much dark fiber
- Laying more fiber now difficult to justify
- Better to buy up assets of failed companies
99Cost competition is brutal in long-haul
100Metro
- Undoubtedly some opportunities exist
- Many companies already in the field
- Ethernet solution typically used
101Enterprise
- Networks are strategic business factors
- Run mission-critical applications
- Data must be shared with many locations
- Network downtime unacceptable
- Disaster recovery of prime importance
- Can require transfer of terabytes of data
- Often look to outsource