INNOVATION IN CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUE: THE TREE OF ACTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

INNOVATION IN CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUE: THE TREE OF ACTION

Description:

... Damdelen, Derya Beyatli, Tatjana Taraszow, Andros Karayiannis, Ilke Dagli ... Munir Altuner, Mustafa Anlar, Polis Aniftos, Ilke Dagli and Tatjana Taraszow ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: redesign
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INNOVATION IN CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUE: THE TREE OF ACTION


1
INNOVATION IN CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUETHE TREE
OF ACTION
  • Alexander N. Christakis, PhD
  • Institute for 21st Century Agoras
  • www.globalagoras.org

2
How People Harness their Collective Wisdom
Power to Construct the Future in
Co-Laboratories of DemocracyAlexander N.
Christakis /  Information Age / February 2006
  •  

3
WHY AN INNOVATION IN DIALOGUE?The Floor Plan of
the Athenian Agora
4
WHY AN INNOVAATION IN DIALOGUE?The New Agora
of the Global Village(The City of Humanly love
Philanthropolis)
5
ESCALATION OF COMPLEXITY AS MEASURED BY THE SCI
  • The Average SCI for the Athenian Agora 3
  • The Average SCI for the Global Village Agora 30
  • COMPLEXITY ESCALATION BY AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE

6
Conventional Dialogue Misadventures
  • What usually happens? Even with conventional
    facilitation support
  • Group dialogue is not focused and wanders
  • Those with power use it to settle differences
  • Iterative discussions take hours, even weeks
  • Group work products of uneven quality or
    usefulness
  • No convergence to an agreement to take action
    with the consensus of participants
  • Not democratic Experts settle the issues they
    own, relieving burden of learning
  • Not participatory True diverse stakeholder
    sessions are rare, customers have no say

7
NEED AN INNOVATION FOR AUTHENTIC DIALOGUE IN
THE NEW AGORAS OF PHILANTROPOLIS
STRUCTURED DIALOGIC DESIGN (SDD) SCIENCE
REPRESENTS THIS INNOVATION THE CASE OF THE
CYPRUS CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUE PROJECT REPRESENTS
AN EXEMPLARY APPLICATION
8
Rationale for the Practice of SDD
  • True dialogue is essential to excavate
    collective wisdom (DEMOSPHIA), and to make
    democracy work.
  • Dialogue is very difficult in todays
    organizational mindset.
  • Complexity of issues demands we address them
    collaboratively, systematically, systemically.

9
An Example of a Co-Laboratory of Democracy
 
10
SDD unequalled for
  • Futures design Normative, futures-creative
    design with stakeholder participation,
    collaboration, and consensus (e.g., Cyprus Civil
    Society Dialogue).
  • Participatory policy making - Democratic,
    transparent consensus building decision making
    (e.g., FDA, USDA, World Health Organization).
  • Eliciting structuring collective wisdom
    (DEMOSOPHIA) for complex problem resolution
    Drawing best ideas forward honoring all levels
    at-stake (e.g., National Patient Safety
    Foundation)

11
Structured Dialogic Design Science Components
  • 4 Axioms
  • 6 Consensus Building Methods
  • 7 Geometrical/Graphic Language Patterns
  • 4 Stages of Interactive Inquiry
  • 7 Laws of Dialogue

12
The Four Axioms
  • 1) COMPLEXITY We live in a world that is very
    complex. Most observers are confused. Systems
    design issues are strongly interconnected
    (Warfield).
  • 2) PARSIMONYY Human cognition attention is
    limited. Human beings are usually overloaded in
    design meetings leading to bad designs (Simon).
  • 3) SALIENCY The field of options in designing
    social systems is multidimensional. Salient
    synthesis is difficult (Boulding).
  • 4) ENGAGEMENT Disregarding the participation of
    the stakeholders in designing social systems is
    unethical, and the designs are bound to fail
    (Ozbekhan).

13
Cyprus Civil Society Dialogue Futures-Creative
Framework
14
Cyprus Civil Society DialogueFacilitation Team
Cohorts
  • Economic Integration Yiouli Takis, Mustafa
    Damdelen, Derya Beyatli, Tatjana Taraszow, Andros
    Karayiannis, Ilke Dagli
  • Media Elia Petridou, Tonia Loizidou, Yiannis
    Laouris, Derya Beyatli, Mustafa Damdelen, Marina
    Christofides
  • Environment Marios Michaelidis, Munir Altuner,
    Mustafa Anlar, Polis Aniftos, Ilke Dagli and
    Tatjana Taraszow

15
Themes of Cyprus Laboratories
  • Laboratory on the Media
  • Laboratory on Political Parties
  • Laboratory on Environment
  • Laboratory on Economic Integration
  • Laboratory on Strengthening NGOs/CSOs
  • Laboratory on 1960 Rights

16
Economic Integration LaboratoryTriggering
questions
  • Idealization With the aim of economic
    integration, what are the benefits
    (opportunities) for Cyprus, of free movement of
    goods and services within Cyprus and the EU?
  • Problematique With the aim of economic
    integration what are the obstacles in achieving
    free movement of goods and services within Cyprus
    and the EU?
  • Action Plan 'With the aim of economic
    integration, what actions should be undertaken to
    overcome the obstacles in achieving free movement
    of goods and services?'

17
ECONOMIC INTEGRATION LABORATORY OF DEMOCRACY
18
ECONOMIC INTEGRATION LABORATORY OF DEMOCRACY
19
PLATRES LABORATORY OF DEMOCRACY
20
PLATRES LABORATORY OF DEMOCRACY
21
The Seven Dialogue Laws
  • Requisite Variety (Ashby)
  • Requisite Parsimony (Miller, Warfield)
  • Requisite Saliency (Boulding)
  • Requisite Meaning Wisdom (Peirce)
  • Requisite Authenticity Autonomy (Tsivacou)
  • Requisite Evolutionary Learning (Dye)
  • Requisite Action (Laouris)

22
The Tree of Action
  • The Laouris Law of Requisite Action requires
    that all six laws of the Tree of Meaning be
    satisfied for action to emerge.
  • (Laouris Christakis, 2007)

23
(No Transcript)
24
Erroneous Priorities EffectAnd Authentic
Community Engagement
  • Whenever stakeholder observations are
    interdependent, assigning priorities by
    aggregating individual importance votes leads
    to erroneous priorities ineffective actions.
  • Effective priorities emerge after evolutionary
    inquiry of the interdependencies among the
    observations through a dialogue focusing on
    influence voting.
  • The capacity of a community of stakeholders to
    implement an action plan effectively is strongly
    dependent on the authentic engagement of the
    community in designing it (Laouris Law of
    Requisite Action).

25
References Sites
  • Working in Dialogue websites
  • The Blogora http//blogora.net
  • Dialogue community support wiki
  • Book website http//Harnessingcollectivewisdom.c
    om
  • Institute for 21st Century Agoras
    http//www.globalagoras.org/
  • Some current projects
  • Civil Society Dialogue Process in Cyprus
  • www.blogora.net/page/CyprusCivilSocietyDialogue
     
  • New Media Landscape Now Project
  • http//cyprusmediascenario-north.wikispaces.com/
  • www.cyprusmedia.wetpaint.com
  • Michigan UDL research and implementation
    Universal Design for Learning
  • USDA Invasive Species Planning Three
    Co-Laboratories of Democracy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com