Title: Legacy Evolution
1Local Service Ordering and Provisioning Fallout
Reduction February 22, 2006
2Fallout What is it?
- If an LSR contains any type of error, it will
typically be rejected by the receiving LEC and
will have to be resent or supplemented
(modified), depending upon the type of error(s) - Fallout consists of the LSR transactions that
must be recycled one or more times due to errors - Can be expressed as a percentage of new LSR
transactions or percentage of total LSR
transactions (including supplements) - Can range as high as 100 of new transactions
- Drain on efficiency
- Inserts delay into service provisioning interval
- Unhappy customers
- Delayed revenue
3Todays objectives
- Share information regarding the causes of fallout
and what service providers can do to minimize it - Review the types and frequency of errors that
cause orders to be rejected - Examine the underlying causes of errors and what
service providers can do to reduce them
4Who is NeuStar?
- Telephone number administration and pooling for
19 countries in North America - Maintain the authoritative database of telephone
numbering resources - Manage the administration of the allocation of
pooled blocks of unassigned telephone numbers
through our clearinghouse, including the
reallocation of pooled blocks of telephone
numbers to the consolidated network of
consolidating carriers following a merger or
other business combination. - Wireline and wireless number portability
- Manage the master, authoritative directory that
allows end-users to change their telephone
carrier without changing their telephone numbers.
- Continuously managed the Number Portability
Administration Center (NPAC) since 1996 - Order management services
- Centralized clearinghouse services permit
communications service providers (CSPs) to
exchange essential operating data - Processed 3M LSR transactions in 2005
5LSR Fallout Analysis - Summary
of Total Fallout by Error Category
Other
Info Found on Pre-Order
Invalid Dates
Pending/ Duplicate Order
11
5
7
40
8
8
Supplement Issue
21
Invalid Trading Partner Info
Provisioning Error
6Information Found on Preorder (40)
- Errors relating to
- The entire account e.g.
- Address
- Telephone numbers
- Circuits
- Features on the account
- Error types
- End user name does not match profile (Customer
Service Record) - Invalid Address
- TN not Found
- Invalid Activity (ACT) Code
- Line share errors
7End User Name Does Not Match Profile
- Root cause
- Provisioner uses account name given by end user
- Countermeasures
- Pull a Customer Service Record (CSR) via an LSR
Preorder to verify the correct name and
formatting. - Cutting-and-pasting the name from the CSR
directly into the order helps eliminate
formatting errors. - Some LSR applications enable the importing of the
account name directly from the CSR response to
the Preorder into the LSR Order.
8Invalid Address
- Root cause
- Provisioner uses address given by end user
- Typically, end users will give their mailing
addresses, which will not always match the
service addresses that the LEC uses.
- Countermeasures
- For all orders except new install activity, pull
a Customer Service Record (CSR) via a Preorder,
cut-and-paste directly, or import into the LSR
order. - For new install orders, process an Address
Validation Preorder, cut-and-paste directly, or
import the address into the LSR order from the
Address Validation Exact Match response to the
Preorder.
9TN Not Found
- Root cause
- Frequently the end user is unsure of what the LEC
uses as the Billing Telephone Number (BTN),
especially if it is a larger account or more than
one account exists at one location. - Provisioner pulled a CSR by the Working Telephone
Number (WTN) only. For some LECs, when the CSR is
requested by WTN, they will not return all TNs
associated with that account.
- Countermeasures
- Pull a Customer Service Record (CSR).
- If no CSR available Most likely the account is
with another reseller and not the LEC. - If CSR returned, verify that the TN is on the
CSR. The TN could be under a different BTN.
10Invalid Activity (ACT) Code
- Root cause
- Provisioner provided incorrect information such
as the wrong activity code on the order. - Example The provisioner has placed a full
disconnect order with only one line on the LSR
order, but the account actually has 3 lines on
it. In this instance, the provisioner should
have submitted a change order (partial
disconnect). - Example The opposite scenario the provisioner
places a change order (partial disconnect), and
the line on the order is the only line on the
account so the provisioner should have submitted
a full disconnect order.
- Countermeasures
- Pulling a CSR allows the provisioner to verify
the lines on the account and create the correct
order activity.
11Line Sharing Error
- Root cause
- Typically means that the wrong Type of Service
(TOS), Network Channel (NC), and Network Channel
Interface (NCI) codes were used when creating the
LSR order
- Countermeasures
- Provisioners should have a cheat sheet for all
TOS, NC, and NCI codes used by their companies by
product. This should be broken down by LEC due to
differences between them. - Pull the CSR and review. Line-sharing will be
listed on the CSR if it is part of the account.
Identifying it will assist the provisioner in
selecting the correct TOS, NC, and NCI codes for
the LSR order.
12Provisioning Error (21)
- Errors relating to
- Missing service codes (e.g., USOCs)
- Invalid formatting of fields
- Specific field required for the order not filled
in
- Error types
- CORRECT Exchange Company Circuit ID (ECCKT) IS
REQUIRED FOR Line Activity (LNA) and Line Number
(LNUM) - INCORRECT DATA IN THE FEATURE FIELD
- (Type of Service) TOS AND LINE Universal Service
Order Code (USOC) DO NOT MATCH
Typically these errors are reduced as
provisioners become more experienced and familiar
with the different business rules of each LEC
with which they interact.
13CORRECT ECCKT IS REQUIRED FOR LNA LNUM
- Root cause
- The provisioner may have used the copy/paste to
populate several service detail forms and then
forgot to change the TN part of the ECCKT to
match the TN on the service details form. - The provisioner may have forgotten to fill in the
ECCKT field, which is required by some LECs for
specific Reqtyp and activities.
- Countermeasures
- Before clicking on the submit button, review each
service detail and ensure the TN and the ECCKT
match. Also ensure the LNUM field is incrementing
on each service detail section - Provisioning expertise Attend any available LEC
provisioning training for each of the LECs to
which your company sends LSRs. - Use a system that provides a pre-validation tool
to alert the provisioner when a field is required
for the specific Reqtyp and activity
14INCORRECT DATA IN THE FEATURE FIELD
- Root cause
- Provisioner either forgot to fill in the FEATURE
data or formatted it incorrectly. Also possible
that not all service codes required for the
specific feature were included. - Example Call Forward Busy, requires the call
forwarding number in the FEATURE field. Each LEC
has specific formatting required for that
information. - Example AYK (anonymous call rejection), which
is prohibited with AYW (anonymous call rejection
with caller id)
- Countermeasures
- Provisioning expertise The more a provisioner
submits orders and works fallout, the more
familiar specific LEC codes will become. - Each of the ILEC websites provides USOC guides
that include not only the service codes but also
the formatting for FIDs. - Use of a cheat sheet for the most commonly used
service codes and the formatting of the FIDs will
assist the provisioner in submitting clean LSR
orders. - Use a system that has templating functionality so
provisioners can create a template with set
service codes (features) their company uses along
with the formatting for the FIDs.
15TOS AND LINE USOC DO NOT MATCH
- Root cause
- Specific LECs require not only the Type of
Service (TOS) field but either a Line Type of
Service (LTOS) or a FEATURE (e.g. USOC) code to
identify the type of service. - The provisioner has used the incorrect codes by
either not matching it to the existing service on
the CSR or by not matching the TOS code to the
LTOS/USOC code.
- Countermeasures
- Pull a CSR to identify the correct type of
service e.g., Centrex, business, residential,
multi-line, PBX - Provisioner should have a cheat sheet of all the
TOS codes for each of the types of service their
company sells, broken down by LEC since each LEC
uses their own TOS codes. - Included on this cheat sheet should be the LTOS
or USOC codes required by the LECs.
16Invalid Trading Partner Information (8)
- Root cause
- Errors relating to trading partner IDs e.g
- Invalid Company Code (CC)
- Invalid Customer Carrier Name Abbreviation (CCNA)
- Countermeasures
- Use cheat sheets
- Use a system that has templating functionality so
provisioners can create templates with
pre-populated trading partner information
encompassing both their company and for each LEC
to which their company sends LSRs
17Supplement Issues (8)
- Root cause
- Errors caused by incorrect submittal of
Supplements or incorrect information on a
Supplement - Errors include
- No original order found
- Previous version being worked
- Activity cannot be changed on a supplement
- Countermeasures
- Provisioning expertise
- Know the LEC business rules governing the
conditions under which a supplement can or cannot
be issued - Use a system which
- Controls the version number
- Will not permit the wrong action to be taken
regarding a supplement - E.g. supplement vs resubmit
- Not change activity
- Not supplement after completion
18Pending / Duplicate Order (7)
- Root cause
- Errors regarding duplicate orders
- Primary error is duplicate Purchase Order Number
(PON) - Typically caused by
- Same order submitted more than once
- Re-use of the same order ID (PON) for different
orders within a prohibited period (usually 2
years)
- Countermeasures
- Good order ID tracking system
- Use a system that prevents duplicate PONs by one
or more of - Performing duplicate PON validation checking
- Auto-generating unique PONs for each new order
19Invalid Dates (5)
- Root cause
- Errors associated with invalid due dates e.g.
- Insufficient interval
- Expedite field required
- Due date is a holiday
- Countermeasures
- Provisioning expertise knowledge of the LECs
standard intervals and rules regarding the
scheduling of due dates - Use of a system that includes business rule
validation encompassing the validation of due
dates and related fields
20Summary 3 Key Countermeasures to Minimize
Fallout
- Pull Preorders to get accurate data on existing
customers with the LEC - There is no substitute for knowledge on the part
of staff creating LSRs - Invest in training
- Create cheat sheets
- The more sophisticated the application being used
to create LSRs, the lower the chance of fallout - Pre-validation of data
- Templates
- Data links between Preorders and Orders