Title: Benedictine University
1 -
- Benedictine University
- Promoting Academic Integrity
- Don McCabe Rutgers University
2 Presentation Agenda
- Overview of research
- Identifying some issues
- Some suggestions for change
3 Research Chronology 1990 to 2007
- College
- Have surveyed 165,00 students at 160 schools
- Have surveyed 18,000 faculty at 110 schools
- Honor codes were an early focus now modified
codes - High School
- Over 35,000 students at 70 schools
- Have also surveyed a small number of faculty
- Hope to expand this work
4 Methodological issues
- Self-report data
- Anonymity concerns with web-based surveys
leading to lower response rates and lower
self-reported cheating? - Changing definition of cheating???
5 2002-2007 Surveys
- Canada
- Students, faculty, TAs, first year students
- 16 participating schools
- United States
- Students, faculty, TAs, first year students
- 102 participating schools
6 Respondents
- U.S Canada
- Undergraduate 82,186 25,352
- Graduate 13,327 2,593
- Other 515 352
- Unknown 1,864 519
- --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - Faculty 14,597 2,560
7 Respondents
- U.S Benedictine
- Undergraduate 82,186 471
- Graduate 13,327 12
- Other 515 0
- Unknown 1,864 15
- --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - Faculty 14,597 94 (50 FT)
8Institutional factors associated with greater
cheating
- Cheating is campus norm (cheating culture)
- School has no honor code
- When students feel faculty dont support
integrity policies, there is little chance of
getting caught and, even if you are, penalties
are not seen as significant (Ditto Benedictine)
9 Students reporting greater cheating
- Business Communications majors
- Males report more test cheating, but females are
closing the gap females report slightly more
cheating on written work except most explicit - Students with low or high grade point averages?
- Those with significant time commitments e.g.,
caring for dependent, job, athletics - Fraternity/sorority members to a moderate degree
10 BenU students reporting greater cheating
- Business (test_at_36) Education (written_at_55)
- Females slightly higher on both test cheating and
cheating on written work but not significant - Students with average GPAs?
- No strong pattern for those caring for dependent,
with job, participating in athletics - Fraternity/sorority members to a moderate degree
11 Self-reported cheating
-
- U.S.
Canada - UG Grad UG
Grad -
- Test Cheating 22 10 18
10 - Written Cheating 42 27
45 31 - (48) (32) (52)
(35) - N 82,186 13,327 25,352 2,593
-
-
12 U.S. Undergraduates
-
- 2002/7 Benedictine
-
- Test Cheating 22 24
- Written Cheating 42 37
- (48) (43)
- N 82,186 471
-
13 Plagiarism Undergraduates
- 2002/7 Benedictine
- Written cut paste 36 32
-
- Written plagiarism 6 4
- Internet cut paste 36 31
- Internet plagiarism 3 2
- (e.g., paper mills)
14 Other notable BenU differences
-
- BenU greater (p
- More BenU students (43 vs. 30) report learning
from another student what was on a test s/he will
take later - More BenU students (51 vs. 42) report working
with others on an assignment when specifically
asked for individual work -
15 Student motivations for cheating
- Pressure to succeed/excel.
- Fairness (Others do it.)
- Material is trivial/irrelevant.
- Courses too hard/faculty unreasonable.
- Sense of entitlement seems important.
- Emulating business practice.
16 Motivations for not cheating
- The peer environment on campus because
students are most affected by the social
environment around them. -
- Self respect. Upbringing (values morals).
- The consequences for cheating or dishonesty.
- Desire to truly learn.
17 Some suggested solutions - BenU
- Eliminate College Physics Web CT quizzes. It is
just too easy to cheat on those. - Faculty should take better notice during exams.
- Actually enforce the policies rather than just
expecting the students to abide them. - Cheating during tests should be reported, but the
students will probably never do that. So that
leaves it up to the instructor.
18 Some suggested solutions - BenU
- Help us learn how to properly site
sources!!!!!!!!!!! - I believe that the faculty should enforce the
academic honesty policy more strictly - I don't think any changes would make a
difference. Students will always find a way to
cheat. -
- I believe BU has, overall, an excellent standard
of academic honesty
19 Faculty
20 How faculty students learn of policy
- Undergrads Faculty
- U.S. Benedictine U.S.
Benedictine - Faculty 63 69 41
40 -
- Handbook 25 27
51 36 - Orientation 18 15
25 20 -
- Note Students - noting they learned
a lot from the source. - Faculty - who used source,
no rating of how much learned.
21 Sources of information - BenU faculty
- Full-time Adjuncts
- Faculty 60 18
-
- Campus website 52 30
-
- Handbook 48 26
- Chair 36 61
- Orientation 20 21
22Faculty safeguards Lost opportunity?
- Change exams regularly 69
- Monitor students closely on tests 70
-
- Info in syllabus about cheating 66
- Discuss views on integrity 65
- Internet to confirm plagiarism 24
- Range 8 to 63 in US. 7 of 96 US schools at
40 or above.
23Faculty safeguards Lost opportunity?
- Change exams regularly 69 (71)
- Monitor students closely on tests 70 (81)
-
- Info in syllabus about cheating 66 (71)
- Discuss views on integrity 65 (73)
- Internet to confirm plagiarism 24 (29)
24Faculty safeguards Benedictine FT(PT)
- Change exams regularly 78 (64)
- Monitor students closely on tests 88 (73)
-
- Info in syllabus about cheating 82 (59)
- Discuss views on integrity 80 (66)
- Internet to confirm plagiarism 32 (25)
25Faculty role My view
- We must remain vigilant at least out of a sense
of fairness for honest students. - Students seem to want some change we need to
encourage them. - More faculty need to come forward. (40 in US
ignore some cases) - Key issue Whats the right balance among
promotion, deterrence and punishment?
26Faculty role Your view
- Change exams and course assignments more often.
- Faculty owe it to honest students to do all in
their power to prevent cheating... - Faculty should make their expectations clear to
students. - Talk to students talk about the effect of
dishonesty in their future careers
27Faculty role Your view
- Faculty members should make a big deal about
academic honesty in all their classes - As instructors we need to be clear in our
expectations. - Many faculty and department chairs do not want to
be hassled with the appeal process and avoid
reporting cases. Faculty need to be more
pro-active about the academic honesty problem on
campus.
28- Ten (Updated) Principles of Academic Integrity
- McCabe Pavela
- May/June 2004
- Principles of academic integrity for faculty.
29Selected principles
- Encourage student responsibility for academic
integrity. - Clarify expectations for students.
- Develop fair and creative forms of assessment.
- Respond to academic dishonesty when it occurs.
30Other faculty strategies
- Multiple versions of exams/assignments.
- Talk about internet, including detection
strategies. - Outlaw electronic devices in tests.
- Listen to students understand their needs and
concerns.
31Suggested institutional strategies
- Programs based on notions of ethical community
building which form basis of culture of
integrity and responsibility. - Faculty staff should engage students in ongoing
dialogue (throughout program) which helps build
community of trust. - Culture should emphasize clear communication of
rules, moral socialization, etc. the hidden
curriculum.
32Suggested institutional strategies
- Student involvement is key. Give them a primary
role orientation, hearing boards, etc. Give
them ownership let them build a new tradition. - Honor codes are increasingly a part of ethical
community building strategies. Modified codes
hold promise in this regard. - Key is for both institution and its faculty to
act failure to act sends powerful message.
33Questions/Comments?
34(No Transcript)
35 -
- Benedictine University
- Promoting Academic Integrity
- Part II
- Don McCabe Rutgers University
36 Presentation Agenda
- Brief overview of research
- Identifying issues specific to Benedictine
- Discussion about possible change
37 2002-2007 Surveys
- Canada
- Students, faculty, TAs, first year students
- 16 participating schools
- United States
- Students, faculty, TAs, first year students
- 102 participating schools
38 Methodological issues
- Self-report data
- Anonymity concerns with web-based surveys
leading to lower response rates and lower
self-reported cheating? - Changing definition of cheating???
39 Respondents
- U.S Benedictine
- Undergraduate 82,186 471
- Graduate 13,327 12
- Other 515 0
- Unknown 1,864 15
- --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - Faculty 14,597 94 (50 FT)
40Institutional factors associated with greater
cheating
- Cheating is campus norm (cheating culture)
- School has no honor code
- When students feel faculty dont support
integrity policies, there is little chance of
getting caught and, even if you are, penalties
are not seen as significant (Ditto Benedictine)
41 Students reporting greater cheating
- Business Communications majors - Business
(test_at_36) Education (written_at_55) - Males report more test cheating, but females are
closing the gap females report slightly more
cheating on written work except most explicit
Females higher on both, but NS - Students with low or high grade point averages?
Reverse? - Those with significant time commitments e.g.,
caring for dependent, job, athletics No
significant pattern - Fraternity/sorority members to a moderate degree
- Same
42 U.S. Undergraduates
-
- 2002/7 Benedictine
-
- Test Cheating 22 24
- Written Cheating 42 37
- (48) (43)
- N 82,186 471
-
43 Other notable BenU differences
-
- More BenU students (43 vs. 30) report learning
from another student what was on a test s/he will
take later. - More BenU students (51 vs. 42) report working
with others on an assignment when specifically
asked for individual work. - BenU students generally report less plagiarism
(e.g., cut paste from Internet - 31 vs.
36). -
44 Student motivations for cheating
- Pressure to succeed/excel.
- Fairness (Others do it.)
- Material is trivial/irrelevant.
- Courses too hard/faculty unreasonable.
- Sense of entitlement seems important.
- Emulating business practice.
45 Faculty
46 Sources of information - BenU faculty
- Full-time Adjuncts
- Faculty 60 18
-
- Campus website 52 30
-
- Handbook 48 26
- Chair 36 61
- Orientation 20 21
47Faculty safeguards Benedictine FT(PT)
- Change exams regularly 78 (64)
- Monitor students closely on tests 88 (73)
-
- Info in syllabus about cheating 82 (59)
- Discuss views on integrity 80 (66)
- Internet to confirm plagiarism 32 (25)
- (Benedictine generally above the U.S. means.)
48Faculty role My view
- We must remain vigilant at least out of a sense
of fairness for honest students. - Students seem to want some change we need to
encourage them. - More faculty need to come forward. (40 in US
ignore some cases) - Key issue Whats the right balance among
promotion, deterrence and punishment?
49Faculty role Your view
- Change exams and course assignments more often.
- Faculty owe it to honest students to do all in
their power to prevent cheating... - Faculty should make their expectations clear to
students. - Talk to students talk about the effect of
dishonesty in their future careers
50Faculty role Your view
- Faculty members should make a big deal about
academic honesty in all their classes - As instructors we need to be clear in our
expectations. - Many faculty and department chairs do not want to
be hassled with the appeal process and avoid
reporting cases. Faculty need to be more
pro-active about the academic honesty problem on
campus.
51- Ten (Updated) Principles of Academic Integrity
- McCabe Pavela
- May/June 2004
- Principles of academic integrity for faculty.
52Selected principles
- Encourage student responsibility for academic
integrity. - Clarify expectations for students.
- Develop fair and creative forms of assessment.
- Respond to academic dishonesty when it occurs.
53Other faculty strategies
- Multiple versions of exams/assignments.
- Talk about internet, including detection
strategies. - Outlaw electronic devices in tests.
- Listen to students understand their needs and
concerns.
54Suggested institutional strategies
- Programs based on notions of ethical community
building which form basis of culture of
integrity and responsibility. - Faculty staff should engage students in ongoing
dialogue (throughout program) which helps build
community of trust. - Culture should emphasize clear communication of
rules, moral socialization, etc. the hidden
curriculum.
55Suggested institutional strategies
- Student involvement is key. Give them a primary
role orientation, hearing boards, etc. Give
them ownership let them build a new tradition. - Honor codes are increasingly a part of ethical
community building strategies. Modified codes
hold promise in this regard. - Key is for both institution and its faculty to
act failure to act sends powerful message.
56Specific BenU Issues
57BenU Faculty Comments - Reporting
- All cheating must be reported so that students
who cheat habitually or in several courses
receive more serious consequences. - More feedback on process allow departments
access to files of repeat offenders when
recommendation letters are requested. -
- Report sanctions in the student paper, obscuring
names of those involved, to show that honesty is
watched, violators caught, and egregious
offenders punished. - Need more faculty discussion to develop a common
mind about the problem.
58BenU Faculty Comments - Adjuncts
- Better training for the adjunct faculty who are
not as familiar with the procedures of the
policy (Adjunct) - We need a mechanism to educate the mass of
adjunct faculty and bring them into this
discussion. (Professor) - Make policies clearer to adjunct faculty and
perhaps hold workshops. (Assoc. Professor)
59BenU Faculty Comments - Miscellany
- Support of faculty pursuing penalties needs to be
absolute. There should be no occurrences, and no
live rumors, of decisions being overturned for
money or political reasons. - There needs to be more transparency in the
judicial process. If I report a student for
cheating, it is VERY important that I know about
the outcome. - Benedictine desperately needs to subscribe to a
service like turnitin.com. -
60BenU Faculty Comments - Code
- Implement honor code and student council.
- Institute an Honor Code like many universities
have, and a student judicial board to
investigate, prosecute, and punish cheaters. Make
it easier to turn in cheaters. - Institute an honor code that all students are
required to learn and subscribe to, then have
students responsible for the judicial process. -
61BenU Student Comments Be stricter
- I think if someone is caught cheating in any way,
it should be an automatic F in the class. NO
EXCEPTIONS! - I think my school's policies regarding cheating
are proper, but they are scarcely if ever
enforced, which needs to be changed. - I think that the school should adhere to its own
policies. - Assignments need to be changed every year re
older siblings and friends. -
62BenU Student Comments Be stricter
- I would like to see professors pay more attention
when students are taking exams - It would be nice to see those students who cheat
actually removed from the class rather than given
a slap on the wrist. - Punish students who initiate cheating.
- I believe that the faculty should enforce the
academic honesty policy more strictly
63BenU Students Need to change tests
- I think it's unfair that some students have old
exams and some don't its an unfair advantage! - Assignments need to be changed every year,
because people who have older siblings or friends
already have all the work, and have an unfair
advantage over other students. - Change the tests/quiz for every sections of the
same class on the same day. - If teachers are making the same exams, that is
their fault.
64BenU Students Cheating common
- I think cheating is a huge problem because
teachers "turn a blind eye" because they do not
want to "offend" anybody. - I think cheating is out of control at BU. I had a
class last year that had a group of students
cheating repeatedly, and the instructor knew. He
gave lectures almost every class about the
importance of integrity, and tried to pursue
consequences for the group of dishonest students.
Apparently, he was later fired for
"discrimination" against these students. What
kind of message does that give to those who are
cheating?
65BenU Students Cheating common
- Cheating is a problem at Benedictine!
- It is amazing how much cheating goes on at
Benedictine that passes by. - It is rare to find people that do not cheat here
at BU. - It seems that cheating on exams is getting worse
with the younger classes. - The school is full of cheating.
66BenU Students Science a problem
- It is obvious in the science classes. Some
professors realize this and try to change tests,
but it still happens in class. - I think that in the Science department there is a
great deal of cheating going on to the detriment
of the honest students! - The science department in particular is a
department full of cheating students. As someone
worried about the future of health care falling
into cheating hands, it is advisable the science
department take immediate action to prevent
mediocre doctors entering the workforce.
67BenU Students Not a problem
- Doing a great job. No specific changes that I
can think of are needed. - I do not see the need for much change in the way
of academic integrity. - I feel that the Instructors are doing a good job
at maintaining academic integrity. - IT is almost non evident at Benedictine. Teachers
are doing a great job.
68BenU Students Unlikely to report
- I think it is the individuals job to support his
or her own academic integrity, no one elses. - Students always have and always will look the
other way no one likes a snitch. Would you
advocate ratting out someones friends? Lay off
the students and don't expect more of them than
their capable of giving. - Students should not be responsible for what other
students do. - Cheating is rampant but students are afraid to
get a fellow student in trouble, whether they're
a friend or not.
69BenU Students Support reporting
- I think that students should be more vigilant in
reporting people that do cheat. - I believe students should have more of a
responsibility to monitor the cheating because
they are the one's that are doing the cheating
and they know how it works. - I think it is up to the students to look out when
cheating takes place, and if they do not report
it then they should talk to the student about
what they saw being taken place. - Students should worry about themselves and let
the system take care of itself.
70BenU Students Miscellaneous comments
- sometimes you just have to get help in order to
meet the demands of career, life, school and
society. - If anything there should be a survey given out to
teachers about grade inflation. - Somebody please stop the Muslim and Indian kids
from cheating, I bust my butt for decent grades
and some just coast into med school because some
of them cheat badly. - I believe the school should play a more active
role in informing students about what cheating is
and what are the consequences of cheating.
71 So now what?