Title: CAS Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 13-15, 2004
1CASCasualty Loss Reserve Seminar September
13-15, 2004
- Reserving for Title Insurance
- and
- Residual Value Coverage
- Alan Hines, FCAS
- PwC LLP
2Overview of Residual Value Coverage
- Insured Exposure
- Protects the owner of an asset against a severe
reduction in the market value at a fixed point in
time. - Definitions
- Asset Expiration Fixed Point in Time
- Insured Value fcn (Expected Residual Value)
anticipates depreciation greater than expected
depreciation. - Residual Value fcn (Market Value or Book Value)
defined by policy terms - Insured Loss (Residual Value lt Insured Value)
at Asset Expiration - Attachment Ratio Insured Amount / Original
Value - Coverage Ratio Insured Amount / Current Value
3Overview of Residual Value Coverage
- Assets Insured
- Vehicles
- Real Estate
- Aircraft
- Commercial Equipment special machinery,
construction equipment, railroad locomotives,
computers electronics
4Overview of Residual Value Coverage
- Who Purchases Coverage
- Automobile Dealerships
- Banks and Finance Companies
- Credit Tenant Lease Arrangers (guarantying the
balloon payment on the note) - Commercial Equipment Manufacturers with leasing
programs
5Overview of Residual Value Coverage
- Competitors in Market
- Active ??? AIG, Great American, Chubb, RVI,
QBE, Mitsui Sumoto, and a few small specialty
insurers - Inactive??? Gulf (Travelers), St. Paul,
Reliance, Philadelphia, Royal Sun Alliance (FSL),
Swiss Re (North American Specialty), Hartford,
ACE - Difficulty assessing since there is no annual
statement line for this coverage. Usually under
Aggregate Write-in or Financial Guaranty
6Overview of Residual Value Coverage
- Material Risk Factors
- Economic Downturn
- Excess Production (supply)
- Market Trends (demand)
- Innovations Rendering Asset Obsolete
7Overview of Residual Value Coverage
- Two Types of Products
- Asset Value Risk protects the residual value at
lease termination. - FASB 13 Risk - This is residual value insurance
to allow for the lessee and lessor to use the
most favorable accounting treatment for the lease
8FASB 13 Risk
- Accounting Treatment for Leases
- - Finance lease accounting lessor can
smooth earnings over the term of the lease - - Operating lease accounting earnings are
realized at the latter part of the lease - To Qualify for financing lease treatment
- PV (Lease payments guaranteed residual
value) - must be gt 90 fair value of leased
asset at lease inception - Lessee and Lessor need not use same treatment
when 3rd party guarantees the residual value. - - Lessee can use operating lease treatment
with off-balance sheet financing that results in
delayed expense recognition
9FASB 13 Risk
- Insured value established to meet 90 test
- Low risk of loss
- Do policies meet FAS 113 risk transfer
requirements? -
10Establishing Insured Values
- Establishing Insured Values
- 90 rule for FASB13
- Auto Leasing Guide - Percentage thereof
- Residualized MSRP
- Underwriting Models to Project Residual Value
11Establishing Market Value at Expiration
- PV Black Book, Auction Value
- RE Appraisal Value defined approach
- CE Green Book
- Aircraft Blue Book
- Specific policy provisions regarding return
conditions and which value/method to use.
12Accounting Issues
- Incurred Loss When is a loss incurred?
- At policy (asset) expiration. Accident year is
asset expiration date. - Proportionally over the life of asset when
there is a reasonable expectation that the
residual value of the asset will be less than the
insured value at asset expiration, the expected
value of the earned loss shall be recorded.
Accident year of paid loss is distributed
proportional to asset term. - Must match method for earning premium
13Accounting Issues
- Earned Premium How is premium earned?
- Expenses earned over policy period, remainder at
policy (asset) expiration - Proportionally over the life of policy asset
- Sum of digits method (like rule of 78)
sometimes used for FASB 13 risk
14Accounting Issues
- Reserves
- Limited use of Case Basis reserves. Multiple
asset policies with reporting requirements and
settlement lag - IBNR Reserve To match premium recognition
- Premium Deficiency Reserve Testing Required
- Statutory reserves Some states may establish
statutory reserve requirements -
15Accounting Issues
- US GAAP Accounting Insurance or Derivative?
- FAS 133 Accounting for derivatives and hedging
activities - - When the residual value is based on an asset
appraisal, or proceeds from a sale exception 10
(e) (2) is met and the contract may be treated as
insurance. - - When the residual value is based on reference
to an asset valuation guide (Black Book, Blue
Book, Green Book) instead of a specific asset
appraisal, the contract does not qualify for the
10 (e) (2) exception and must be accounted for as
a derivative. - - When based on a combination of a multiple
underlyings (ie higher of), accounting based on
contracts predominant characteristics. Under
10(e) no exception if residual value of other
underlyings is highly correlated to guide book!
16Estimating Loss Reserves
- Loss Ratio Approach
- Aggregate Models
- Frequency Severity Approach
- Development of Coverage Ratios
- Econometric Modeling
- Individual Asset
- Asset Classes
-
17Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Database of Insured Assets
- Original Appraisal Date and Value
- Most recent value and valuation date
- Asset Termination Date and Insured Value
- Asset Characteristics PV - make, model, year,
VIN - RE age, construction, location, use
- Policy Parameters deductibles, offset, limits,
mileage/asset condition charges, settlement terms
-
-
18Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Projection Assumptions
- Probability of reaching full term
- Probability of return to lessor at end of term
- Current book value
- Depreciation
-
-
19Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Probability of Reaching Full Term Not Constant
- Varies by length of lease
- Varies by type of vehicle
- Function of market value gain or loss
-
-
20Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
21Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Probability of Vehicle Being Returned to Lessor
- Varies by length of lease
- Varies by type of vehicle
- Function of market value gain or loss
-
-
22Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
23Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
24Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- PV Depreciation Data Sources
- Auto Leasing Guide (ALG)
- Black Book Used Vehicle Guide
- Bureau of Labor Statistics (CPI)
- Global Insight (DRI) economic indices
- Manheim Used Vehicle Indices
-
25Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Modeling Used Vehicle Depreciation
- Vehicle Attributes Make, Segment, Body Style,
Age Product cycle (age of body style) - Seasonality
- Supply Competition Index (dealer incentives),
Used Vehicle Stock Index (by segment), New
Vehicles Sold (lagged 3-5 years) - Demand Consumer Confidence, Unemployment
- Economic Factors New and Used Car Price Index,
New Car Auto Loan Rate, CPI
26Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric
ModelingEstimating Depreciation
27Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric
ModelingEstimating Depreciation
28Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric
ModelingEstimating Depreciation
29Estimating Loss ReservesEstimating
DepreciationAverage Monthly Depreciation 1999
Vehicles
Ave. Monthly Ave. Monthly Ave. Monthly
Vehicle Type Depreciation Vehicle Type Depreciation Vehicle Type Depreciation
SUV Luxury Mid Size
Ford Explorer 2.16 Lincoln Continental 1.98 Ford Taurus 2.23
Chevrolet Blazer 2.04 Chevrolet Corvette 1.21 Chevrolet Malibu 2.11
Toyota 4Runner 1.23 Lexus GS300 1.43 Toyota Camry 1.42
Honda CRV 1.21 Acura RL 1.57 Honda Accord 1.34
Mitsubishi Montero 1.57 Mitsubishi 300GT 0.96 Mitsubishi Gallant 1.88
30 Monthly Depreciation Rates 00 to 04 (All
Segments)Weighted Average Black Book
Month 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Wt. Average
January -1.64 -1.81 -0.67 -1.25 -1.50 -1.26
February -1.62 -1.22 1.52 -1.79 -1.24 -0.84
March -2.97 -1.29 0.44 -1.65 -0.92 -0.90
April -1.41 -1.36 -0.38 -1.66 -0.59 -0.95
May -0.88 -0.79 -1.02 -1.25 0.54 -0.47
June -1.95 -0.88 -1.58 -1.33 -0.35 -0.99
July -2.23 -1.74 -1.45 -0.45 -1.72 -1.26
August -0.54 -1.38 -1.21 -0.55 -2.25 -1.40
September -1.48 -1.80 -1.64 -0.16 -1.69 -1.20
October -0.79 -1.28 -2.50 -0.32 -1.24
November -2.24 -7.92 -4.50 -2.41 -3.75
December -3.06 -1.10 -3.00 -2.27 -2.45
Wt. Average -1.75 -1.91 -1.34 -1.26 -1.07
31Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- PV Underwriting Considerations
- Who is insured, Bank or Dealer
- Type of Vehicles
- Mileage and Condition
- Length of Lease
- Market Trends
- Optional Equipment
- Deductibles
32Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Real Estate
- Long Term Projections
- Monitor Mark to Market Coverage Ratios
- Monitor Concentration of Risk
- Assess loss of stressed markets by assessing
relative position of the cycle and cycle delta
for historical depressions.
33Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Real Estate Depreciation Data Sources
- National Real Estate Index - Global Real
Analytics - Standard Poors
- Cushman Wakefield and SIOR Market Reports
- Property Portfolio Research, Inc (ppr.info)
- CB Richard Ellis (cbre.com)
- Torto Wheaton Research (trw.com)
34Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric Modeling
- Modeling Real Estate Depreciation
- Property Type Office, Retail, Industrial,
Hotel/Motel, Other - Location Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Areas, State Average, National Average - Supply/Demand Average Market Rent, New Starts,
Completions, Vacancy Rates, Net Absorption, Total
Occupancy - Economic Factors Market Capitalization Rates,
Interest rates, Employment
35Estimating Loss ReservesEconometric
ModelingReal Estate Depreciation
36Estimating UPR ReservesThree NAIC Tests
- Test 1 Best estimate of the amounts refundable
to contract holders. - Test 2 Gross premium multiplied by the ratio
of gross losses and expenses incurred during the
unexpired term to the total gross losses and
expenses under the contract (nominal basis). - Test 3 The present value of the expected
future losses and expenses.
37Estimating UPR Reserves
38NAIC Tests 2 3 for UPR Reserves
Proportion Back-End
Company Company
1 1 GWP 100 100
2 2 EP 35 10
3 3 UEP 65 90
4 4 Tot Expense 28 28
5 5 Incurred 22 22
6 6 Remaining 6 6
7 7 Projected Loss 110 110
8 8 Incurred 38.5 0
9 9 Remaining 71.5 110
Test 2 Test 2 Test 2
10 10 Ratio (96)/(47) 56.2 84.1
11 11 Required UEP 56.2 84.1
Test 3 Test 3 Test 3
12 Discount Factor Discount Factor 90 90
13 PV (Loss Expense) (12)x(9) (6) PV (Loss Expense) (12)x(9) (6) 69.8 104.4
14 UPR Reserve Max (3), (11), (13) UPR Reserve Max (3), (11), (13) 69.8 104.4
15 Total Reserves (8) (14) Total Reserves (8) (14) 108.3 104.4