Chapter 10 Measurement and Attitude Scaling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 10 Measurement and Attitude Scaling

Description:

... to estimate the magnitude of a characteristic, or quality, that an object ... for about one year, please tell us how satisfied you are with your Ford Taurus. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3033
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: CharlieCoo8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 10 Measurement and Attitude Scaling


1
Chapter 10Measurement and Attitude Scaling
2
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
  • Explain what needs to be measured to address a
    research question or hypothesis
  • Define operationalization
  • Distinguish levels of scale measurement
  • Explain the need for index or composite measures
  • List the three criteria for good measurement
  • Explain the significance of scale reliability and
    validity
  • Describe how marketing researchers think of
    attitudes

3
LEARNING OUTCOMES (contd)
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
  • Identify basic approaches to measuring attitudes
  • Discuss the use of rating scales for measuring
    attitudes
  • Represent a latent construct by constructing a
    summated scale
  • Summarize ways to measure attitudes with ranking
    and sorting techniques

4
What Do I Measure
  • Measurement
  • The process of describing some property of a
    phenomenon of interest, usually by assigning
    numbers in a reliable and valid way.
  • Concept
  • A generalized idea about a class of objects,
    attributes, occurrences, or processes
  • Operational Definition
  • Specifies what the researcher must do to measure
    the concept under investigation

5
EXHIBIT 10.1 Are There Any Validity Issues with
this Measurement?
6
Operational Definitions
  • Operationalization
  • The process of identifying scales that correspond
    to variance in a concept to be involved in a
    research process.
  • Scales
  • A device providing a range of values that
    correspond to different values in a concept being
    measured.
  • Correspondence rules
  • Indicate the way that a certain value on a scale
    corresponds to some true value of a concept.

7
Operational Definitions (contd)
  • Variable
  • Anything that varies or changes from one instance
    to another can exhibit differences in value,
    usually in magnitude or strength, or in
    direction.
  • Constructs
  • Concepts measured with multiple variables.

8
EXHIBIT 10.2 Media Skepticism An Operational
Definition
9
Levels of Scale Measurement
  • Scale
  • A series of items arranged along a continuous
    spectrum of values for the purpose of
    quantification.
  • Properties uniquely classify, preserve order,
    set equal intervals, and have a natural zero.
  • Types of Scales
  • Nominal classifies/identifies by a quality of
    the object
  • Ordinal classifies using a ranking order of
    objects
  • Interval quantifies objects in order on a
    continuum
  • Ratio classifies by comparison to a standard
  • Categorical classifies by a specific
    characteristic

10
EXHIBIT 10.3 Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and
Ratio Scales Provide Different Information
11
EXHIBIT 10.4 Facts About the Four Levels of Scales
12
EXHIBIT 10.4 Facts About the Four Levels of
Scales (contd)
13
Index Measures
  • Attributes
  • Single characteristics or fundamental features
    that pertain to an object, person, or issue.
  • Index Measures
  • Assign a value based on how much of the concept
    being measured is associated with an observation.
  • Indexes often are formed by putting several
    variables together.
  • Composite Measures
  • Assign a value to an observation based on a
    mathematical derivation of multiple variables.

14
Three Criteria for Good Measurement
Reliability
Validity
Good Measurement
Sensitivity
15
Reliability versus Validity
  • Reliability
  • The degree to which measures are free from random
    error and therefore yield consistent results.
  • An indicator of a measures internal consistency.
  • Validity
  • The accuracy of a measure or the extent to which
    a score truthfully represents a concept.
  • Does a scale to measure what was intended to be
    measured?

16
EXHIBIT 10.5 Reliability and Validity on Target
17
Measurement Accuracy Sensitivity
  • Sensitivity
  • A measurement instruments ability to accurately
    measure variability in stimuli or responses.
  • Composite measures allow for a greater range of
    possible scores, they are more sensitive than
    single-item scales.
  • Sensitivity is generally increased by adding more
    response points or adding scale items.

18
Attitudes in Marketing Research
  • Attitude
  • An enduring disposition to consistently respond
    in a given to various aspects of the world.
  • Attitudes as Hypothetical Constructs
  • Hypothetical construct describes a latent or
    unobservable variable that is measurable only by
    an indirect means such as verbal expression or
    overt behaviorattitudes are considered to be
    such variables.

19
Components of an Attitude
Affective
Cognitive
Attitude
Behavioral
20
Components of an Attitude
  • Affective Component
  • The feelings or emotions toward an object
  • Cognitive Component
  • Knowledge and beliefs about an object
  • Behavioral Component
  • Predisposition to action
  • Intentions
  • Behavioral expectations

21
Techniques for Measuring Attitudes
Measuring Attitudes
22
Attitude Measuring Processes
  • Ranking
  • Requiring the respondent to rank order objects in
    overall performance on the basis of a
    characteristic or stimulus.
  • Rating
  • Asking the respondent to estimate the magnitude
    of a characteristic, or quality, that an object
    possesses by indicating on a scale where he or
    she would rate an object.

23
Attitude Measuring Processes
  • Sorting
  • Presenting the respondent with several concepts
    typed on cards and requiring the respondent to
    arrange the cards into a number of piles or
    otherwise classify the concepts.
  • Choice
  • Asking a respondent to choose one alternative
    from among several alternatives it is assumed
    that the chosen alternative is preferred over the
    others.

24
Attitude Rating Scales
  • Simple Attitude Scale
  • Requires that an individual agree/disagree with a
    statement or respond to a single question.
  • This type of self-rating scale classifies
    respondents into one of two categories (e.g. yes
    or no).
  • Example

THE PRESIDENT SHOULD RUN FOR RE-ELECTION _______
AGREE ______ DISAGREE
25
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Category Scale
  • A more sensitive measure than a simple scale in
    that it can have more than two response
    categories.
  • Question construction is an extremely important
    factor in increasing the usefulness of these
    scales.
  • Example

How important were the following in your decision
to visit San Diego? (check one for each
item) VERY SOMEWHAT NOT TOO IMPORTANT IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT CLIMATE ___________ ___________ ________
___ COST OF TRAVEL ___________ ___________ _______
____ FAMILY ORIENTED ___________ ___________ _____
______ EDUCATIONAL/HISTORICAL ASPECTS ___________
___________ ___________ FAMILIARITY WITH
AREA ___________ ___________ ___________
26
EXHIBIT 10.6 Selected Category Scales
27
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Method for Summated Ratings Likert Scale
  • A popular means for measuring attitudes.
  • Respondents indicate their own attitudes by
    checking how strongly they agree or disagree with
    statements.
  • Typical response alternatives strongly agree,
    agree, uncertain, disagree, and strongly
    disagree.
  • ExampleIt is more fun to play a tough,
    competitive tennis match than to play an easy
    one.
  • ___Strongly Agree ___Agree ___Not Sure
    ___Disagree ___Strongly Disagree

28
EXHIBIT 10.7 Likert Scale Items for Measuring
Attitudes toward Patients Interaction with a
Physicians Service Staff
Source Stephen W. Brown and Teresa A. Swarts, A
Gap Analysis of Professional Service Quality,
Journal of Marketing, April 1989, p. 95.
29
Attitude Rating Scales Techniques
  • Reverse Recoding
  • A method of making sure all the items forming a
    composite scale are scored in the same direction.
  • Negative items can be recoded into the equivalent
    responses for a non-reverse coded item.

30
Attitude Rating Scales Techniques
  • Composite Scale
  • A way of representing a latent construct by
    summing or averaging respondents reactions to
    multiple items each assumed to indicate the
    latent construct.
  • Item Analysis
  • Ensures that final items evoke a wide response
    and discriminate among those subjects with
    positive and negative attitudes.
  • Only a set of items showing good reliability and
    validity should be summed or averaged to form a
    composite scale representing a hypothetical
    construct.

31
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Semantic Differential
  • A series of seven-point rating scales with
    bipolar adjectives, such as good and bad,
    anchoring the ends (or poles) of the scale.
  • A weight is assigned to each position on the
    scale. Traditionally, scores are 7, 6, 5, 4, 3,
    2, 1, or 3, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3.
  • Example

Exciting ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
___ Calm Interesting ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
___ ___ Dull Simple ___ ___ ___ ___
___ ___ ___ Complex Passive ___ ___ ___
___ ___ ___ ___ Active
32
EXHIBIT 10.8 Semantic Differential Scales for
Measuring Attitudes toward Supermarkets
Source Julie H. Yu, Gerald Albaum, and Michael
Swenson, Is a Central Tendency Error Inherent in
the Use of Semantic Differential Scales in
Different Cultures? International Journal of
Market Research, Summer 2003, downloaded from
Business Company Resource Center,
http//galenet.galegroup.com.
33
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Image Profile
  • A graphic representation of semantic differential
    data for competing brands, products, or stores to
    highlight comparisons.
  • Because the data are assumed to be interval,
    either the arithmetic mean or the median will be
    used to compare the profile of one product,
    brand, or store with that of a competing product,
    brand, or store.

34
EXHIBIT 10.9 Image Profile of Commuter Airlines
versus Major Airlines
Source J. Richard Jones and Sheila I. Cocke, A
Performance Evaluation of Commuter Airlines The
Passengers View, Proceedings Transportation
Research Forum 22 (1981), p. 524. Reprinted with
permission.
35
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Numerical Scales
  • Scales that have numbers as response options,
    rather than semantic space or verbal
    descriptions, to identify categories (response
    positions).
  • In practice, researchers have found that a scale
    with numerical labels for intermediate points on
    the scale is as effective a measure as the true
    semantic differential.
  • Example
  • Now that youve had your automobile for about one
    year, please tell us how satisfied you are with
    your Ford Taurus.Extremely Dissatisfied 1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 Extremely Satisfied

36
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Stapel Scale
  • Uses a single adjective as a substitute for the
    semantic differential when it is difficult to
    create pairs of bipolar adjectives.
  • Tends to be easier to conduct and administer than
    a semantic differential scale.
  • Example
  • Measuring a Stores Image Store Name 3
    2 1 -1 -2 -3Based on the
    strength of your belief, select a minus number if
    you disagree with the adjective, or select a
    positive number if you agree with the adjective.

37
EXHIBIT 10.10 A Stapel Scale for Measuring a
Stores Image
Source Dennis Menezes and Norbert F. Elbert,
Alternative Semantic Scaling Formats for
Measuring Store Image An Evaluation, Journal of
Marketing Research, February 1979, pp. 8087.
Reprinted by permission of the American Marketing
Association.
38
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Constant-sum Scale
  • Respondents are asked to divide a constant sum to
    indicate the relative importance of attributes
  • Respondents often sort cards, but the task may
    also be a rating task (e.g., indicating brand
    preference).
  • Example
  • Divide 100 points among each of the following
    brands according to your preference for the
    brand
  • Brand A _________
  • Brand B _________
  • Brand C _________

39
Attitude Rating Scales (contd)
  • Graphic Rating Scale
  • A measure of attitude that allows respondents to
    rate an object by choosing any point along a
    graphic continuum.
  • Advantage allows the researcher to choose any
    interval desired for scoring purposes.
  • Disadvantage there are no standard answers.
  • Thurstone Scale
  • Judges assign scale values to attitudinal
    statements and subjects are asked to respond to
    these statements.

40
EXHIBIT 10.11 Graphic Rating Scale
41
EXHIBIT 10.12 A Ladder Scale
42
EXHIBIT 10.13 Graphic Rating Scale with Picture
Response Categories Stressing Visual Communication
43
EXHIBIT 10.14 Summary of Advantages and
Disadvantages of Rating Scales
44
Measuring Behavioral Intention
  • Behavioral Component
  • The behavioral expectations (expected future
    actions) of an individual toward an attitudinal
    object.
  • Buying intention the behavioral tendency to seek
    additional information, or plans to visit a
    showroom.
  • Example
  • How likely is it that you will purchase an mp3
    player?
  • I definitely will buy
  • I probably will buy
  • I might buy
  • I probably will not buy
  • I definitely will not buy

45
Measuring Behavioral Intention (contd)
  • Behavioral Differential
  • Measures the behavioral intentions of subjects
    towards any object or category of objects.
  • A description of the object to be judged is
    placed on the top of a sheet, and the subjects
    indicate their behavioral intentions toward this
    object on a series of scales.
  • Example A 25 year-old woman sales
    representativeWould ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
    ___ ___ Would Not
    ask this person for advice.

46
Ranking
  • Paired Comparison
  • A measurement technique that involves presenting
    the respondent with two objects and asking the
    respondent to pick the preferred object more
    than two objects may be presented, but
    comparisons are made in pairs.
  • ExampleI would like to know your overall
    opinion of two brands of adhesive bandages. They
    are MedBand and Super-Aid. Overall, which of
    these two brandsMedBand or Super-Aiddo you
    think is the better one? Or are both the same?
  • MedBand is better _____
  • Super-Aid is better _____
  • They are the same _____

47
Sorting
  • Sorting Tasks
  • Require that respondents indicate their attitudes
    or beliefs by arranging items on the basis of
    perceived similarity or some other attribute.
  • Example
  • Here is a sheet that lists several airlines. Next
    to the name of each airline is a pocket. Here are
    ten cards. I would like you to put these cards in
    the pockets next to the airlines you would prefer
    to fly on your next trip. Assume that all of the
    airlines fly to wherever you would choose to
    travel. You can put as many cards as you want
    next to an airline, or you can put no cards next
    to an airline.
  • Cards
  • American Airlines _____
  • Delta Airlines _____
  • United Airlines _____
  • Southwest Airlines _____
  • Northwest Airlines _____

48
Key Terms and Concepts
  • Measurement
  • Concept
  • Operationalization
  • Scales
  • Correspondence rules
  • Construct
  • Nominal scales
  • Ordinal scales
  • Interval scales
  • Ratio scales
  • Attribute
  • Index measure
  • Composite measures
  • Reliability
  • Validity
  • Sensitivity
  • Attitude
  • Hypothetical construct
  • Ranking
  • Rating
  • Sorting
  • Choice
  • Category scale
  • Likert scale

49
Key Terms and Concepts (contd)
  • Reverse recoding
  • Composite scale
  • Semantic differential
  • Image profile
  • Numerical scale
  • Stapel scale
  • Constant-sum scale
  • Graphic rating scale
  • Behavioral differential
  • Paired comparison
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com