The Experience of Canadian Firms and Industries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

The Experience of Canadian Firms and Industries

Description:

The Experience of Canadian Firms and Industries. Jo Van Biesebroeck ... Tire. 4. 22. 15. Rank. 1995.6. Radio. 2. Engine. 2. 1991.9. Lock. 1. Year. Part. Rank ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: johannesva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Experience of Canadian Firms and Industries


1
The Experience of Canadian Firms and Industries
  • Jo Van Biesebroeck
  • Economics Department, University of Toronto
  • Industry Canada Rotman
  • Offshore Outsourcing Capitalizing on Lessons
    Learned

2
Outsourcing Multiple Parts An Application to
the Automotive Industry (with Lijun Zhang)
  • Global Value Chains in the Automotive Industry
    Prospects for Canada
  • (with Gary Gereffi and Tim Sturgeon)

3
Overview
  • Why does it matter to look at many parts?
  • It accelerates outsourcing
  • for a variety of reasons
  • Preliminary findings for the automotive industry
  • Importance for Canadian firms

4
Looking at many parts
  • The whole is more than the sum of its parts cars
    are the prototype of integral design
  • Organize activities along a supply chain
  • Relational contracts become feasible
  • As costs fall and quantity rises, high FC/ low MC
    strategies become more attractive
  • There might be complementarities
  • Institutions can develop

5
1. Integral design
  • Clark-Fujimoto (1991) Product Development
    Performance Strategy, Organization, and
    Management in the World Auto Industry
  • Most components interact in myriad ways
  • Difficult to separate design from manufacturing
  • Car components trade in Asia lags other sectors
    (relative to the West)
  • When production jobs disappear, engineering jobs
    might go with them

Looking at many parts
6
1. Integral design
  • Question Why are so few finished cars traded?
  • Industry developed in high-wage countries (skill
    involved in design!)
  • Poor countries served by exports of second hand
    cars and second hand designs (for local mfg)
  • Once low-wage countries acquire design
    capabilities, why wouldnt we see exports to NA?
  • (p MC margins are huge 50)

Looking at many parts
7
2. Supply Chains Value Chains
  • A structured organization helps to
  • exploit comparative advantage across countries
  • exchange information efficiently
  • conduct innovation
  • Relational Contracts expand feasible set
  • Long tradition in economics ? in a repeated game
    more equilibria can be supported
  • E.g. Toyota outsourcing suppliers recover FC in
    unit price (they have infinite memory)

Looking at many parts
8
2. Supply Chains Value Chains
  • Note Division of sales (in trade data) will
    differ from division of value added
  • Electronics intermediate parts often embody most
    of the technology
  • Question who initiates offshoring?
  • Automobiles OEMs
  • Apparel further upstream low-tech intermediates
  • Electronics (modular) contract manufacturing

Looking at many parts
9
3. high FC / low MC strategy
  • Antrás (2005) life cycle model
  • Cut-offs between organizational forms are a
    function of quantity, which is linked to
    cost/price through final good demand
  • ? we augment the model for multiple parts
  • Melitz (2004) heterogeneous firms
  • Activities follow productivity ranking
  • FDI exporting only domestic sales

Looking at many parts
10
3. high FC / low MC strategy
  • Questions What to make of opposite predictions
    on relation between productivity offshoring?
  • Serving domestic market (Antras) low
    productivity firms go first
  • Serving foreign market (Melitz) high
    productivity firms go first

Looking at many parts
11
4. Complementarities
  • Novak-Stern (2003) when you outsource one part,
    you might as well outsource more
  • IP protection
  • Compete on cost or time to market
  • Coordination efforts are interdependent
  • Van Biesebroeck (2007)
  • Outsourcing is complementary to other production
    decision (e.g. greater product variety)

Looking at many parts
12
4. Complementarities institutions
  • Nunn (2007) ? Acemoglu, et al. (2005)
  • Does contracting environment provides comparative
    advantage for goods requiring specific
    investments or vice versa?
  • ? we allow production to affect institutions
  • d f( of components outsourced)
  • Empirical finding past outsourcing predicts
    price (?) time to off-shore (?)

Looking at many parts
13
Findings for the automotive industry
  • Within-component price heterogeneity is important
    (quality?)
  • Very distinct trade patterns
  • Sourcing pattern generates a (somewhat) intuitive
    ordering of parts and countries
  • Some evidence of contracting complementarities /
    institutions developing

14
1. Price heterogeneity chassis
15
1. Price heterogeneity tires
16
2. Trade patterns
  • Very large regional trade flows
  • NAFTA
  • EU
  • South-East Asia (Japan, Korea, Thailand, China)
  • MNEs supply their overseas assembly locations
    from their home base
  • Customized components follow the product-cycle
  • Domestic content requirements abound
  • Oursourcing to low-wage countries is rising

Findings for the automotive industry
17
3. Ordering of parts and countries
Average year (post 1989) that exports to the U.S.
start for a list of 34 parts/modules North
is Japan and Western Europe
Findings for the automotive industry
18
3. Ordering of parts and countries
Average year (post 1989) exports to the U.S.
start
Findings for the automotive industry
19
4. Complementarities - institutions?
Findings for the automotive industry
20
Importance for Canadian firms
  • Revisit the four findings
  • Price
  • Trade
  • Sourcing
  • Complementarities

21
1. Price
  • For many parts, Canadian prices are at the low
    end, i.e. very competitive
  • Within each part, there is demand for high
    quality high price varieties

Importance for Canadian firms
22
2. Trade
  • Regional given that production volumes in NA
    wont increase, the almost total reliance on U.S.
    is precarious
  • Low cost Especially since NAFTA, this is not
    going to be Canadas comparative advantage
  • Supply overseas plants
  • customized inputs Head-Reis-Spencer (2004)
  • Through exports or FDI APMA survey (2005)

Importance for Canadian firms
23
3. Sourcing
  • In a world of incomplete contracting,
    attractiveness is a combination of production
    cost and quality of institutions
  • Off-shoring is not all or nothing, new parts and
    technologies are introduced continuously

Importance for Canadian firms
24
4. Complementarities
  • Generates feedback effects
  • Changes that strengthen Canadas position for one
    part, will increase marginal productivity of
    investments in other parts
  • Also works in reverse failure to
  • Coordination helps
  • One of the strengths of the industry in Canada

Importance for Canadian firms
25
Thanks
  • For a copy of the slides jovb_at_chass.utoronto.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com