Title: Turbulent Dynamo
1Turbulent Dynamo
Stanislav Boldyrev (Wisconsin-Madison) Fausto
Cattaneo (Chicago)
Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in
Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas
2Questions
1. Can turbulence amplify a weak magnetic field?
- What are the scales and growth rates of
- magnetic fields?
Kinematic Theory
3MHD Equations
?tv (vr)v -rp (rB)B ??v f
Kinematic dynamo
?tB r(vB) ??B
ReVL/?
- Reynolds number
RmVL/?
- magnetic Reynolds number
Pm?/?
- magnetic Prandtl number
4Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo Phenomenology
V(x, t) is given.
?tB r(vB) ??B
Consider turbulent velocity field V(x,t) with the
spectrum
?V? / ?1/3
? 1/K
?? ?/?V?/ ?-2/3
smaller eddies rotate faster
Magnetic field is most efficiently amplified by
the smallest eddies in which it is frozen. The
size of such eddies is defined by resistivity.
B
5Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo Phenomenology
Role of resistivity ?
Small Prandtl number,
Large Prandtl number,
PM ?/? 1
PMÀ 1
Dynamo growth rate
Dynamo growth rate
? 1/??
? 1/??
smooth velocity ? V?/ ?
rough velocity ? V? / ?? ?1/3
6Phenomenology Large Prandtl Number Dynamo
Magnetic lines are folded
Cattaneo (1996)
Schekochihin et al (2004)
7Phenomenology Small Prandtl Number Dynamo
Small Prandtl number PM?/? 1 Stars,
planets, accretion disks, liquid metal
experiments
?V? ?1/3
?? ?/?V? / ?2/3
?
?? / (RM)-3/4
Dynamo growth rate
? 1/???/ (RM)1/2
RM
Numerics Haugen et al (2004)
S.B. F. Cattaneo (2004)
8Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo Theory
V(x, t) is a given turbulent field
?tB r(vB) ??B
Two Major Questions
1. What is the dynamo threshold, i.e., the
critical magnetic Reynolds number RM, crit ?
2. What is the spatial structure of the growing
magnetic field (characteristic scale,
spectrum)?
These questions cannot be answered
from dimensional estimates!
9Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo Theory
Dynamo is a net effect of magnetic line
stretching and resistive reconnection.
RM gt RM, crit stretching wins, dynamo
RM lt RM, crit reconnection wins, no dynamo
RMRM, crit stretching balances reconnection
??
B
When RM exceeds RM, crit only slightly, it takes
many turnover times to amplify the field
10Kinematic Turbulent Dynamo Kazantsev Model
homogeneity and isotropy
incompressibility
Dynamo
No Dynamo
11Kazantsev Model Large Prandtl Number
If we know ?(r, t), we know growth rate and
spectrum of magnetic filed
Large Prandtl number PM?/? À 1
- Kazantsev model predicts
- 1. Dynamo is possible
- 2. EM(K)/ K3/2
Numerics agree with both results
Schekochihin et al (2004)
12Kazantsev Model Small Prandtl Number
PM?/? 1
Is turbulent dynamo possible?
Batchelor (1950) analogy of magnetic field and
vorticity. No
Kraichnan Nagarajan (1967) analogy with
vorticity does not work.
?
Vainshtein Kichatinov (1986)
Yes
13Small Prandtl Number Dynamo Is Possible
PM?/? 1
PM?/? À 1
Keep RM constant. Add small-scale eddies
(increase Re).
Kazantsev model dynamo action is always
possible, but for rough velocity (PM1) the
critical magnetic Reynolds number (RMLV/?) is
very large.
14Kazantsev Model Small Prandtl Number
L/??
Theory S. B. F. Cattaneo (2004)
smooth velocity
Kolmogorov (rough) velocity
PMÀ 1
PM 1
Simulations P. Mininni et al (2004) A. Iskakov et
al (2007)
RM, crit
May be crucial for laboratory dynamo, PM 1
Re
15Kinematic Dynamo with Helicity
It is natural to expect that turbulence can
amplify magnetic
field at K K0
Can turbulence amplify
magnetic field at K K0 ?
large-scale dynamo
16Dynamo with Helicity Kazantsev Model
hs v (r v)d3 x ? 0
given
energy
helicity
magnetic energy
magnetic helicity
need to find
Equations for M(r, t) and F(r, t) were derived by
Vainshtein and Kichatinov (1986)
17Dynamo with Helicity Kazantsev Model
Two equations for magnetic energy and magnetic
helicity can be written in the
quantum-mechanical spinor form
hs v (r v)d3 x ? 0
hs v (r v)d3 x 0
S. B. , F. Cattaneo R. Rosner (2004)
18Kazantsev model and ?-model
? - model
assumes scale separation
r
Kazantsev model, NO scale separation
The ? - model approaches the exact solution only
at r? 1
19Conclusions
- Main aspects of kinematic turbulent dynamo is
relatively - well understood both phenomenologically and
analytically.
2. Dynamo always exists, but
3. Separation of small- and large-scale may be
not a correct procedure.