Collapsing%20Bubbles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Collapsing%20Bubbles

Description:

Rachel Collapsing Bubbles Rachel Bauer Jenna Bratz Introduction Bubbles have been entertaining children for centuries. Children blew bubbles through clay pipes back ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Jenna192
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Collapsing%20Bubbles


1
Collapsing Bubbles
Rachel
  • Rachel Bauer
  • Jenna Bratz

2
Introduction
  • Bubbles have been entertaining children for
    centuries.
  • Children blew bubbles through clay pipes back in
    the 1700s.
  • Today over 200 million bottles of bubbles are
    sold each year!
  • Although fun, there is a direct mathematical
    reason for which they appearsoap films seek to
    minimize their surface energy, which means
    minimizing surface area, making it a sphere.

3
Procedure
  • We suspended a tube off of a lab stand.
  • Grid paper (1cm blocks) was set up behind the
    tube.
  • Three different tubes were used--a capillary
    tube, a straw and a large plastic tube
  • Rachel dabbed the soap solution onto the tube and
    blew a bubble and Jenna started and stopped the
    high speed camera to capture the collapse of the
    bubble.
  • The camera took 60 frames per second.

4
Procedure (cont.)
  • The videos were stored as a sequence of pictures.
  • Pictures were put into Matlab and a program was
    used to find the least squares circle to fit the
    data points around the bubble
  • The average radius was then calculated

5
Data
Straw Trial 3
Initial Bubble
After .45 sec
After .7 sec
After .85 sec
6
Theory
  • We want to begin modeling the deflation of a soap
    bubble through a narrow tube.
  • By Poiseuilles equation we know that the change
    in the gas volume with respect to time is given
    by , where r is the radius, l is
    the length of the tube, is the viscosity of
    the air, and is the change in pressure.

7
Theory (cont.)
  • The equation for the change in volume of the
    bubble is also given by where R
    is the radius of the bubble.
  • By the Laplace-Young Law we have since
    there are two surfaces of the bubble.
  • Setting the two equations equal and separating
    variables we get the following equation
  • with initial condition .

8
Theory (cont.)
  • Solving this differential equation we find
  • The radius was then calculated using a Matlab
    program that takes points around bubble and finds
    the least squares circle to fit those points.
    (Thanks Derek!)
  • Next we wanted to calculate the surface tension
    for each of the trials.

9
Analysis
  • We want to compare the actual radius we found for
    our data with the expected radius given by the
    theory.
  • Find the least squares curve that approximates
    our data points.

R
t
10
Analysis (cont.)
  • Minimize the error between the square of the sum
    of the expected (theoretical) radii and the
    actual radii , where
  • and n is the number of data
  • points we have.
  • Differentiating E with respect to we have

11
Analysis (cont.)
  • We want to find when is equal to 0.
  • We plotted the functions for each trial in Maple
    and found the x-intercept.
  • This is the that minimizes the error.
  • Capillary Tube
  • Trial 1 .0198 N/m 19.8 dynes/cm
  • Trial 2 .0225 N/m 22.5 dynes/cm
  • Trial 3 .022 N/m 22 dynes/cm

12
Analysis (cont.)
  • Plastic Tube
  • Trial 1 .00625 N/m 6.25 dynes/cm
  • Straw
  • Trial 1 .01335 N/m 13.35 dynes/cm
  • Trial 2 .01316 N/m 13.16 dynes/cm
  • Trial 3 .0141 N/m 14.1 dynes/cm
  • Consistent within the same tube, inconsistent for
    different size tubes.
  • Straw trials seems to be the best, closest to
    expected value (13-14 dynes/cm).

13
Two Bubble Theory
  • Extend the model to one with two bubbles, one at
    each end of the tube
  • Analysis will begin the same as above. We now
    just have two bubbles with volumes V1 and V2.

14
Two Bubbles (cont.)
  • The change in the gas volume is
  • The change in the volume of the two bubbles is

15
Two Bubbles (cont.)
  • The change in pressure will change.
  • We have .
  • Using the Laplace-Young Law we find
  • Similar to before, set the two equations for dV1
    and dV2 equal and plug in the equations for the
    change in pressure.

16
Two Bubbles (cont.)
  • Find two coupled nonlinear first order
    differential equations
  • The total volume in this system is
    and therefore,
  • so our system has a conservation lawthe
    volume is a constant.

17
Two Bubbles (cont.)
  • Phase Plane analysis of system of equations
  • Steady-state occurs when R1 R2.
  • R1 gt R2
  • R1 lt R2

18
Two Bubbles (cont.)
  • Directional Field

xR1, yR2
19
Two Bubbles (cont.)
  • Since the volume is a constant, the equation
  • gives the equation for the trajectories in the
    phase plane

xR1, yR2
20
Spherical Cap
  • Note as one bubble gets smaller, the shape
    changes from a sphere to a spherical cap.
  • We can modify our model to take this into
    account.
  • Assume that R1 gt R2, then R1 will increase and R2
    will decrease as described above.
  • Find equations that model the time after R2
    equals the radius of the tube.

21
Spherical Cap (cont.)
  • The equation for R1 will stay the same, since the
    shape stays spherical.
  • The volume of the spherical cap is
  • therefore the change in volume
    of the cap is given by

22
Spherical Cap (cont.)
  • We get the following system of equations
  • This system also has a conservation of volume
    law. , so we have

23
Spherical Cap (cont.)
  • The volume is constant, so the equation
    gives the equation for a
    trajectory in the phase plane of this system.

a R1, b R2
24
Spherical Cap (cont.)
  • We can plot both phase planes and both
    trajectories to see the difference after R2
    equals the radius of the tube.
  • We start with R1 gt R2, R1 will increase along the
    black trajectory until it reaches the point where
    R2 is equal to the radius of the tube, then R1
    will follow the green trajectory and will not
    increase as much as it would have if it followed
    the original trajectory.

xR1, yR2
25
Conclusion
  • In general, our surface tension was not
    consistent throughout our different trials.
    Possible reasons for error
  • Air hitting the bubble
  • Bubble not remaining steady
  • Measurement error

26
Conclusion (cont.)
  • In the two bubble case, the theory matched small
    experimental results from class.
  • Future work
  • More experiments to find additional surface
    tension values.
  • Extend two bubble case to n bubbles
  • Attempt to isolate bubble from any disturbances
    in the lab
  • Complete experiments to further verify two bubble
    case
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com